PDA

View Full Version : Federer takes Nasdaq-100 title!!!

EliteNinja
04-04-2005, 04:03 AM
Omg, did you see the match?!

Nadal was 2 points away from victory!!!
Federer came back from 5-3 in the tiebreak of the 3rd set to win it!!

It took 5 sets, almost 4 hours of tennis!
ilya
04-04-2005, 04:29 AM
Read about it, it sounded amazing. I almost took Nadal at 9:2, woulda lost but looks like it would have been a good bet. I wonder how long before Nadal wins a Grand Slam.
zaxx19
04-04-2005, 04:34 AM
Wow, mens tennis....

You canucks are really desperate since the NHL has folded tent arent you.. /images/graemlins/grin.gif

Federer is alot better than the rest of them....

and it really isnt that close. Its refreshing bc he is an old style shotmaker now if only someone from the "power" school could step their game up a bit to rival him tennis might move back into the American consciousness.
SGS
04-04-2005, 04:41 AM
Safin = power and won the Australian this year. He could rival Federer if he is able to consitently perform.

SGS
ilya
04-04-2005, 04:49 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Wow, mens tennis....

You canucks are really desperate since the NHL has folded tent arent you.. /images/graemlins/grin.gif

Federer is alot better than the rest of them....

and it really isnt that close. Its refreshing bc he is an old style shotmaker now if only someone from the "power" school could step their game up a bit to rival him tennis might move back into the American consciousness.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh, power tennis is boring. I'd rather another shotmaker came along to challenge him.
zaxx19
04-04-2005, 04:52 AM
I agree Ilya but the matchup would be nice.


[ QUOTE ]
Safin = power and won the Australian this year. He could rival Federer if he is able to consitently perform.


[/ QUOTE ]

That might be the biggest IF in one on one sports....

Oh, well other than "If Phil Mickelfat got his blubbery ass in shape how good would he be?"
jakethebake
04-04-2005, 08:52 AM
Nothing to do with tennis needs three exclaimation marks after it. Ever.
BeerMoney
04-04-2005, 08:54 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Nothing to with tennis needs three exclaimation marks after it. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure thing, boss.
EliteNinja
04-05-2005, 04:28 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Nothing to do with tennis needs three exclaimation marks after it. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol /images/graemlins/smirk.gif
But dude, you shoulda seen the match!
It was pwnage!!!
jason_t
04-05-2005, 04:31 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Nothing to do with tennis needs three exclaimation marks after it. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maria Sharapova!!!
jakethebake
04-05-2005, 09:16 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nothing to do with tennis needs three exclaimation marks after it. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maria Sharapova!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I suppose Anna Kournikova!!! also works. I stand corrected. /images/graemlins/grin.gif