PDA

View Full Version : Waiting to protect until turn: extremely large pot.


luckyplayer
04-01-2005, 06:38 PM
UTG is LPP. No other reads.

PokerStars 0.05/0.10 Hold'em (8 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with J/images/graemlins/heart.gif, J/images/graemlins/club.gif.
UTG calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls, UTG calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 caps</font>, MP1 calls, Hero calls, Button calls, BB calls, UTG calls.

Flop: (24.40 SB) 6/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 4/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 6/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, Button calls, BB folds, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls.

Question: Is this a time I should only call? Nearly 26 small bets in the pot means that even if I raise, anybody with even 3 outs can usually cold call profitably.

Turn: (17.20 BB) 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
UTG checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, Button calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls.

Question: Does raising the turn do anything but protect me from overcards? All flushes are now dead, and UTG+1 bet out again after capping preflop, which tells me I'm likely behind here. Is calling a better option?

River: (27.20 BB) 7/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
UTG checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, MP1 folds, Hero calls, Button calls, UTG calls.

Final Pot: 31.20 BB

Delphin
04-01-2005, 06:49 PM
On the flop, I think you played it right, but I'm interested in what others say, because this is a tough spot for me too.

On the turn, I definitely think you have to raise. If you are only getting overcards to fold, that's fine. You'd hate to see a A,K,Q on the river and lose to a better full house.

On the river, I just call. There is a good chance UTG+1 has AA,KK,QQ with the preflop cap.

aK13
04-01-2005, 06:53 PM
I like the play.

I think you're forced to raise on the flop -- the pot is huge already, so I think you want to try to get players out if you can (not many, but you'll at least get 1 or 2 to probably fold). Again, on the turn, same logic, but given UTG's actions, I would agree that you're probably behind a bigger pocket pair, but I still think you need to raise to get players out in case you're ahead to keep players with A or K high rivering you.

keikiwai
04-01-2005, 06:57 PM
I flike preflop and flop.

A read on UTG+1 would be very important here.

I would not raise the turn. What do you gain? UTG+1 is clearly not folding, and what hands do you put him on? I would guess:
AA, KK or QQ w/ a small possibility of AKs or AKo (here's where the read would be important). Anyway, you are behind AA, KK, QQ, you're splitting the pot w/ JJ.

A turn raise may get a flush draw to fold due to the 3 of a kind on board, but it's outweighed by the fact that could well be behind UTG+1. This puts you in a difficult position, but I think checking through is the better course of action. I think you are playing against UTG+1. I don't think anyone has the 6 or the river would have been raised. I don't think anyone else except UTG+1 has a higher pocket pair than you (although you never know, there are people who routinely fail to re-raise pf w/ AA and even KK for whatever retarded reason, again reads help here). So, don't raise the turn, since you're not getting rid of UTG+1, and even if you get rid of everyone else, it won't matter if UTG+1 beats you.

In fact I would check both turn and river, and fold to any re-raise.

PS: I agree w/ that this is not protecting your hand but would be raising for value.

droolie
04-01-2005, 07:00 PM
You can't protect your hand here. Your bets are for value. You have huge overlay with all the callers in this hand.

Look at it this way.... You have 3 weak callers in the hand. They all contribute they same amount each round as you and the pf raiser. If you only win this hand 30% of the time you make a ton of money if get in this situation and decide to ram and jam this 1000 times over. pf raiser might be making more money than you on average but you still profit as long as you're winning more then your fair share. I have very little doubt that you win this pot well over 20% of the time.

Only calling the river is OK because worse hands might fold for 2 bets but they will certainly call one. You therefore cannot value bet if you think that only hands that beat you will stay in to see the showdown. If you absolutely knew they would all call with hands you beat you could raise but I seriously doubt it here.

ErrantNight
04-01-2005, 07:04 PM
this is an easy wait for the turn.

the pot is huge. it was capped 6 ways. your flop raise will accomplish nothing.

you can't offer much worse odds to your opponents on the turn, but you can offer much worse odds all the same.

additionally, there's a substantial number of overcards yet to drop. if they start falling, you'd like to not invest extra bets (but you're going to showdown).

lastly... UTG+1 capped. this is .05/.10 so i suppose the cap could mean anything, but as you move up, this probably means two cards that work really, really well together. like a higher pocket pair. you're playing on hoping they have unimproved overcards, or something like TT.

keikiwai
04-01-2005, 07:13 PM
Win over 20% of the time?

The read would be important here... but let's see.

If UTG+1 is not overly aggressive then I put him on QQ, KK, AA. All of which you are behind, hence do not raise turn. I throw out AKs due to river action, but even throwing AKs in you will win less than 20% of the time.
AA (12)
KK (12)
QQ (12)
AKs (8)
you win 8 to 36 (8/44 = slightly &lt; 20%)

If UTG+1 is very aggressive, then I put UTG+1 on TT, JJ, QQ, KK, AA, or AKs (not AKo unless a maniac, even AKs unlikely due to river action, but let's throw it in).
TT (12)
JJ (1)
QQ (12)
AA (12)
AKs (8)
Total of 45 hand combos.
You are ahed of 20, tie 1 and are behind 24. Odds to win 20:25. Great odds! Go for it.

Truth is probably somewhere inbetween. The read makes the difference.

tomcain
04-01-2005, 07:13 PM
I put UTG+1 on a full house also. I probably would not raise the turn.

Tom

DoctorDrew
04-01-2005, 07:25 PM
Here's my read on this hand:

What raises PF and caps a 3 bet? AA, KK, QQ, JJ(Unlikely), AK (maybe AQs, TT, 99) with a higher probability of the first 3.

Flop: He leads (expected) Calls a raise makes me think overcards. BTW, I am raising here b/c I want more dead money in this huge pot. If I wait for the turn, I am not going to change the odds enough for most people to fold to a raise (8:1- most people will call this, so I am getting my money in when I think I am ahead)

Turn: Third 6 falls and he leads again. Is it more likely he thinks his overcards are good now, or is he more confident that his PP is good. I favor the later with him having an overpair that is not AA, but better than JJ. So, I think I go for the call here, because I can't lay this down and with so many callers, I have the implied odds to call.

River: Crying call, but I am certain you are beat (probably QQ). More important info would be what the callers have come along with.

So, unless UTG+1 is a total LAG or a tricky TAG, the chance you are ahead when he leads the turn are very small. But, I tend to tighten up in this situation against an unknown aggressor, figuring most online player are loose-passive.

FishHooks
04-01-2005, 07:31 PM
I agree, waiting for the turn is best, your turn raise will give the callers behind you about 8:1 form the pot, good enough to push out gutshots etc, and that way you get more value from your hand. You can't assume the UGT will lead out on the turn like he did.

bottomset
04-01-2005, 07:37 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Win over 20% of the time?

The read would be important here... but let's see.

If UTG+1 is not overly aggressive then I put him on QQ, KK, AA. All of which you are behind, hence do not raise turn. I throw out AKs due to river action, but even throwing AKs in you will win less than 20% of the time.
AA (12)
KK (12)
QQ (12)
AKs (8)
you win 8 to 36 (8/44 = slightly &lt; 20%)

If UTG+1 is very aggressive, then I put UTG+1 on TT, JJ, QQ, KK, AA, or AKs (not AKo unless a maniac, even AKs unlikely due to river action, but let's throw it in).
TT (12)
JJ (1)
QQ (12)
AA (12)
AKs (8)
Total of 45 hand combos.
You are ahed of 20, tie 1 and are behind 24. Odds to win 20:25. Great odds! Go for it.

Truth is probably somewhere inbetween. The read makes the difference.

[/ QUOTE ]

uh its only 6combos of each pp, 4combos of AKs

keikiwai
04-01-2005, 09:00 PM
How is it only 6 combos of each PP.

AA you can dealt 1 out of 4 As as hole card 1, then you can dealt 1 out of the 3 remaining As as hole card 2.
That is 4 * 3 possible ways of getting AA dealt. Let me illustrate

Hole 1 Hole 2
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/heart.gif
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/club.gif
A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/heart.gif
A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/club.gif
A/images/graemlins/club.gif A/images/graemlins/heart.gif
A/images/graemlins/club.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
A/images/graemlins/club.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif
A/images/graemlins/heart.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
A/images/graemlins/heart.gif A/images/graemlins/club.gif
A/images/graemlins/heart.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif

I count 12

Same thing for AKs
(AK + KA)*4

A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif and
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif

are different, since the fact that they could be dealt to you in two orders increases the chance that you will be dealt them as opposed to if you could only get them dealt in one order.

PS: I did screw up JJ. There are TWO ways villain could have it not 1.

luckyplayer
04-01-2005, 09:26 PM
Thanks for everyone's input. Looks like I could not protect here at all, so raising for value was the right play. Also, when UTG+1 bet the turn, I should have been in call down mode. Does anybody disagree with this?

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
UTG has 2c 2h (full house, sixes full of twos).
UTG+1 has Qc Qd (full house, sixes full of queens).
Hero has Jh Jc (full house, sixes full of jacks).
Button has 9c 9s (full house, sixes full of nines).
Outcome: UTG+1 wins 31.20 BB. </font>

Kumubou
04-01-2005, 09:29 PM
[ QUOTE ]
How is it only 6 combos of each PP.

[/ QUOTE ]
You are counting permutations of the hand, when really only the possible combinations of AA matter. A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/heart.gif and A/images/graemlins/heart.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif are the same hand, even though it is two different permutations thereof. The result of this is that you double-count the number of ways to do it.

-K

FishHooks
04-02-2005, 01:44 AM
Reread the posts, some of us including me think that waiting for the turn to raise is much better.

Malachii
04-02-2005, 03:05 AM
I think waiting until the turn has some merit, regardless of what your opponents have. This is a concept which is easy to misapply (I've done it myself several times!) but if you keep pumping money into the pot, any gutshot or overcards can call profitably. You might want to review "Protecting your hand when the pot is extremely large" in SSH.

FishHooks
04-02-2005, 03:10 AM
agreed, this is one of the times where that section is really usefull.

cmwck
04-02-2005, 04:21 AM
[ QUOTE ]
How is it only 6 combos of each PP.

AA you can dealt 1 out of 4 As as hole card 1, then you can dealt 1 out of the 3 remaining As as hole card 2.
That is 4 * 3 possible ways of getting AA dealt. Let me illustrate

Hole 1 Hole 2
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/heart.gif
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/club.gif
A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/heart.gif
A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/club.gif
A/images/graemlins/club.gif A/images/graemlins/heart.gif
A/images/graemlins/club.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
A/images/graemlins/club.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif
A/images/graemlins/heart.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
A/images/graemlins/heart.gif A/images/graemlins/club.gif
A/images/graemlins/heart.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif

I count 12

Same thing for AKs
(AK + KA)*4

A/images/graemlins/spade.gif A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif and
A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif A/images/graemlins/spade.gif

are different, since the fact that they could be dealt to you in two orders increases the chance that you will be dealt them as opposed to if you could only get them dealt in one order.

PS: I did screw up JJ. There are TWO ways villain could have it not 1.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are counting each hand twice. The AhAd and AdAh are the same hand.

To count combinations, think of it as slots you have to fill with objects. So, you have two slots and you want to count the number of ways you can put aces into them. So you have four aces in front of you, and for the first slot you can put any of the four aces into it. For the second slot you only have 3 aces available, since you used one ace to fill the first slot. So, a choice of 4 aces in the first slot and 3 aces in the second slot gives you 4x3 = 12 combinations of AA.

luckyplayer
04-02-2005, 09:46 PM
Yeah, i agree now with waiting. I had actually just read the section when I posted this, and I thought this seemed like a good example. I guess I was agreeing with the others since I would still be getting called by the strong draws anyway, but the whole purpose is to protect against all weak draws. Even though the 5 out draws may still be able to call even with waiting, the 4 out draws would only be getting ~8 to 1, making their draws unprofitable.

FishHooks
04-03-2005, 03:52 AM
Yep yep, glad you leanred something from this, so did I. I haven't had too many situations come up this, leanred a lot fromt his post. Great discussion