View Full Version : I'm surprised at how quickly I got over...
jcmack13
03-31-2005, 08:03 PM
feeling embarrassed anout bluff-betting every street in position against a loose-passive who kept calling and calling and then rivering a highly unlikely card to give me a winning hand.
I used to feel kinda guilty getting super-lucky at the river. I'm glad that's over.
SinCityGuy
03-31-2005, 08:17 PM
You shouldn't be embarrassed that you got lucky and won the hand, but you should be embarrassed for trying to bluff a calling station.
x2ski
04-01-2005, 01:11 AM
[ QUOTE ]
You shouldn't be embarrassed that you got lucky and won the hand, but you should be embarrassed for trying to bluff a calling station.
[/ QUOTE ]
I finally realized the same thing yesterday. I too am embarrassed. Live and learn I guess.
Saint_D
04-01-2005, 01:25 AM
If you have PT, go back and examine those hands. Look and see if you really "rivered an unlikely card."
It's quite possible you had the pot equity/pot odds to raise, or at least call. (And if you would call and can raise for the same price, raise by all means.)
Making a card on the river when the pot is big and you have a bunch of outs is just good poker. And having a calling station to bet into makes it all the better.
If you are betting out with a 2 outer on every street and rivered a lot, you are just lucky and need to plug a big leak before it costs you.
-D
jcmack13
04-01-2005, 01:38 PM
[ QUOTE ]
You shouldn't be embarrassed that you got lucky and won the hand, but you should be embarrassed for trying to bluff a calling station.
[/ QUOTE ]
Oops. I meant weak-tight and not loose-passive. Just bluffing against someone who usually folds unimproved on the turn, but then he calls (and i raise my eyebrow intending to check the river behind him) and out of nowhere comes an unlikely out. good feeling.
Beavis68
04-01-2005, 01:39 PM
I always figure that that is what I they get for not protecting their hands.
Remember, all your opponents are sub-human, retards, when they lose it is just the natural order of things.
archmagi
04-01-2005, 02:09 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I meant weak-tight and not loose-passive
[/ QUOTE ]
ok now it's better
einbert
04-01-2005, 02:34 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Remember, all your opponents are sub-human, retards, when they lose it is just the natural order of things.
[/ QUOTE ]
This made me smile.
It's true too.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.