Voltron87
03-27-2005, 02:31 PM
was always a big BM player. I enjoyed being at the table, the conversation, the environment, all that stuff. I enjoyed being able to see my opponents, what type of person they were, how they played, etc. I'm not claiming to be Hellmuth, but it definitely did help my game to have a person across from me. But recently, with the exception of higher stakes games that are exceptionally good at times, I've found that live play is just not as profitable as online poker. I'm sick of seeing a tiny number of hands per hour, I'm sick of how slow it goes. I'm convinced that when the time take is 8-10$ per hour in a 1/2 NL 250 buy in game, if the players are slow enough, and fairly tight (not TAG, just slightly weak tight, with weak/slightly loose fish mixed in), the game is not very profitable. Maybe I've just been on a bad run of cards, maybe I'm just frustrated, but BM poker also prevents you from moving on and putting hands behind you.
I guess my drift is that when mid/low limit BM poker is slow enough, it is a waste of time compared to the online games as they are right now if the players are fairly tight, and the time charge is big enough. Goodbye cardroom hello online. Though I think higher stacks NL (500 buy in games and over) with fishy players is still very profitable.
Anyone else have similar complaints about BM play?
I guess my drift is that when mid/low limit BM poker is slow enough, it is a waste of time compared to the online games as they are right now if the players are fairly tight, and the time charge is big enough. Goodbye cardroom hello online. Though I think higher stacks NL (500 buy in games and over) with fishy players is still very profitable.
Anyone else have similar complaints about BM play?