Cerril
03-25-2005, 06:40 AM
I'm just flushing money from somewhere. It's only 16k hands but everything points to a massive leak. A bit part is seeing too many showdowns or more precisely the wrong ones. I'm only at a small negative overall but I'm not ending sessions repeatedly going 'I owned these guys, but have had bad luck lately.'
Anyway, to some specific questions while I examine my game. I feel like I lose 1.5-2.5BB a lot of the time in a situation that goes like this. High cards, raise, get a cold caller in CO/Button, and one of the blinds calls. Reads aren't highly exploitable in any direction except that they're too loose, AF between 1-3. No pair no draw will fold, a tendency to bet when checked to last to act, and any draw that can beat top pair will remain, some cases are capable of being tricky. Three to the flop which gives me no help, though I've got at least one over. Checked to me, I bet, called two ways. Checked to me on the turn.
Now I'm leaving out a lot here that might or might not be pertinent. The board might or might not be coordinated. I might have two unders to an ace or only one over to a king, or I might have AK/AQ on a small board. I might have a gutshot. I can be close to certain that if I check here it'll either be bet behind me (usually) or by the blind on the river (occasionally). I'm leaving it out partially because I'm curious if these things -are- pertinent or if I'm looking at a section of hands that are terrible enough to not even bother holding up the aggression
Variations on this occur if I'm holding absolutely nothing on the button and it's checked to me on the turn after continuing to be aggressive on the flop.
This is one of those areas where I have trouble gaguing the correct aggression - when I've got something it's easy to bet out but when I have nothing at what point do I surrender to two hands that probably have me beat between them. The 'bet flop, bet turn, check behind on river with Ace high' has definitely been the cause of some of my overaggression.
Anyway, to some specific questions while I examine my game. I feel like I lose 1.5-2.5BB a lot of the time in a situation that goes like this. High cards, raise, get a cold caller in CO/Button, and one of the blinds calls. Reads aren't highly exploitable in any direction except that they're too loose, AF between 1-3. No pair no draw will fold, a tendency to bet when checked to last to act, and any draw that can beat top pair will remain, some cases are capable of being tricky. Three to the flop which gives me no help, though I've got at least one over. Checked to me, I bet, called two ways. Checked to me on the turn.
Now I'm leaving out a lot here that might or might not be pertinent. The board might or might not be coordinated. I might have two unders to an ace or only one over to a king, or I might have AK/AQ on a small board. I might have a gutshot. I can be close to certain that if I check here it'll either be bet behind me (usually) or by the blind on the river (occasionally). I'm leaving it out partially because I'm curious if these things -are- pertinent or if I'm looking at a section of hands that are terrible enough to not even bother holding up the aggression
Variations on this occur if I'm holding absolutely nothing on the button and it's checked to me on the turn after continuing to be aggressive on the flop.
This is one of those areas where I have trouble gaguing the correct aggression - when I've got something it's easy to bet out but when I have nothing at what point do I surrender to two hands that probably have me beat between them. The 'bet flop, bet turn, check behind on river with Ace high' has definitely been the cause of some of my overaggression.