View Full Version : KK Versus PF Cap
gaming_mouse
03-24-2005, 03:55 AM
I'm a 6:13 dog (6 combos of JJ) against his possible range when the turn hits, so betting out here is ok, right? This guy was super-tight and certainly had AA-JJ,AK.
Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (9 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)
Preflop: Hero is BB with K/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, K/images/graemlins/spade.gif.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 raises</font>, <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 caps</font>, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls.
Flop: (12.33 SB) A/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 3/images/graemlins/club.gif, 7/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 folds, MP1 calls.
Turn: (7.16 BB) Q/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 raises</font>, Hero folds.
Final Pot: 10.16 BB
pokerkai
03-24-2005, 04:09 AM
I like it...dont see TT or JJ making that raise.
gaming_mouse
03-24-2005, 04:10 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I like it...dont see TT or JJ making that raise.
[/ QUOTE ]
Against this guy, the fold was the easy part. The question was should I have bet out in the first place? I think it was okay, but just checking....
einbert
03-24-2005, 04:13 AM
If you're certain that's his range, I don't see how anything other than checking and calling can be correct.
gaming_mouse
03-24-2005, 04:22 AM
[ QUOTE ]
If you're certain that's his range, I don't see how anything other than checking and calling can be correct.
[/ QUOTE ]
I am. I am also certain that he folds JJ.
Calling down is about a 2:8 bet, which I am a 6:13 dog to win:
EV_calldown = -2*(13/19) + 8*(6/19) = 1.15
EV_betout = -1(13/19) + 6*(6/19) = 1.21
At the time I just had an instinct betting out was better, but I guess I was right.
einbert
03-24-2005, 04:39 AM
What if he checks behind with JJ on the river?
You could conceivably check/call the turn and check/fold the river to a bet.
It's just hard for me to see how betting could be productive at all against that range of hands.
A couple of other things:
By calling down you give yourself a chance to hit your set. When you bet out he will most likely always either fold or raise, so you miss that chance.
Check/folding could possibly be the most profitable play.
gaming_mouse
03-24-2005, 04:55 AM
[ QUOTE ]
What if he checks behind with JJ on the river?
[/ QUOTE ]
This makes the EV of calling down even lower, so hurts your argument.
[ QUOTE ]
You could conceivably check/call the turn and check/fold the river to a bet.
[/ QUOTE ]
This is not a good option, since he might easily fire away again with JJ. If you plan on folding, do it on the flop.
[ QUOTE ]
It's just hard for me to see how betting could be productive at all against that range of hands.
[/ QUOTE ]
Did you read my post above? The EV calc shows you why. It allows you to save a bet when behind, while still winning when ahead. I told you that he would fold JJ to a bet.
[ QUOTE ]
A couple of other things:
By calling down you give yourself a chance to hit your set. When you bet out he will most likely always either fold or raise, so you miss that chance.
Check/folding could possibly be the most profitable play.
[/ QUOTE ]
c/folding is clearly not as profitable as calling down, which is +EV, as I showed. c/folding is 0 EV.
The choice is between betting and folding to a raise, or calling down. It's close, but either is defensible.
The only real argument against my line is that you could say there is no way I can be certain of the assumptions I made (about him folding JJ, eg). Nonetheless, I felt I was right, as this guy played week tight, had a VPIP of 9 after 170 hands, and PFR of 4.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.