This probably means I'm running bad, right?

[GoblinMason (Craig)]

I just moved up in limits and I'd like to think I'm losing because I'm running bad; actually I'm pretty sure of it. I've always used this as a sign of running bad; makes sense right?

WSD has been discussed as needing to be around %30 and W$@SD should be around 55 if this is so. Right?

https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/cmason/www/running.jpg

Edit: Small sample size of 3k, but then again running bad better be a small sample. /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[thirddan]

i also made a filter for the premium type hands to see how they are holding up relative to where they should be long term...

but none of this really matters since your sample is worthless...

[MHarris]

Hi Craig,

You're just running bad. I was playing the 5/10 BBJ with you this weekend, and the games there sometimes lend themselves to almost 15/30-like variance (in terms of BB) over short periods of time. I'm in a 10K hand funk as well, and it's not my first or shortest there. You'll pull through, and when you do, you'll see what a goldmine these games can be.

You are correct about what WSD and W$SD should be.