1st 400 $50+5 NLHE Sng Results

[HC5831]

I finished another block of 100 tournies today for a total of 400. Here are my results. These results are 2 tabling.

ROI - 100 blocks:
1st: 42%
2nd: 55%
3rd: -7%
4th: 15%
Avg Total: 26%

Finish breakdown:
1st: 63/400 = 16%
2nd: 45/400 = 11%
3rd: 53/400 = 13%
4th: 42/400 = 11%
ITM: 40%

I got slammed over an 180 game period, basically breaking even. It was very disheartening and I took 2, one month breaks during that stretch. I played well, everything went against me. I was due for some bad luck due to my good luck earlier.

I tried 3 tabling, but it was too much for me. I broke even over 100 tournies, which are not included in my results.

I tried 99 tournies at the $109 level and had a 5% ROI. I found them to be significantly harder. I wouldn't recondmend them unless you are very good.

I was aiming for a long term ROI of 36%, but I think this is unrealilistic now. I'm aiming for 25% now. I'd love to see results from any 50+5 players who have 300+ tournies.

I plan to stick to 2 tabling the 50's for a while. The 109's are much harder and the swings are greater. I'm not even sure I could beat them for half of my 50 ROI to make them worth while. Although I am a lot better now. I played the 109's after playing 200 of the 50's. I've learned a ton in the last 200 50's even though I had bad luck.

HC

[McBandit]

[ QUOTE ]

I broke even over 100 tournies, which are not included in my results.



[/ QUOTE ]
You should include your break-even stretches too because those affect your ROI.

McBandit

[HC5831]

[ QUOTE ]
You should include your break-even stretches too because those affect your ROI.



[/ QUOTE ]

If the break even stretch is the same category as the other games, then by all means they should be included. However, you missed a very important point here. The 100 game break even stretch was with me 3 tabling. I usually 2 table and it greatly affected my play. I didn't have enough time to make good reads and there were too many players for me to remember. Therefore, the results are not relevent to my 2 table stats. It would be stupid for me to try to inflate my results by intentially leaving out unfavorable results.

I guess nobody is interested in more significant results. I have 400 tournies here. I've seen posts that have less than 100 tournies played that get more replies...

HC

[XChamp]

I'm very interested. I have a buddy that 4 tables the $50s and just hit 300. he has a 25% ROI. hope that helps... (probably doesn't)

[Nottom]

[ QUOTE ]
I guess nobody is interested in more significant results. I have 400 tournies here. I've seen posts that have less than 100 tournies played that get more replies...

[/ QUOTE ]

Grats, you have a 25% ROI at 50+5s. What do you want people to say?

[HC5831]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm very interested. I have a buddy that 4 tables the $50s and just hit 300. he has a 25% ROI. hope that helps... (probably doesn't)

[/ QUOTE ]

Being able to 4 table the 50's for a 25% ROI is good. It helps a little. Any significant results are helpful.

HC

[HC5831]

[ QUOTE ]
Grats, you have a 25% ROI at 50+5s. What do you want people to say?

[/ QUOTE ]

lmao, anything. Obviously you play the 50's as I do. How about posing your results? I'd love to see them.

Maybe my 25% ROI is great. Maybe it blows for 2 tabling, I dunno. I'm trying to get perspective here.

The search function blows and I can't find any good info. The info I do find is contridictary. Plus, actual results helps me compare a lot more.

My time is valuable to me. I don't want to waste it if nobody is interested. Simple as that. That's why I commented on the lack of responses.

HC