DontTellMama
03-18-2005, 06:20 PM
I see people repeatedly respond that many of the bb/100 or bb/hr rates posted here are "unsustainable", a result of a sample that is too small, and/or are likely a result of "running good". Is there a general consensus as to what number of hands at the same limit are required before the results are reliable and the player can be confident that his/her results are a result of playing good (which of course would include running good and bad) ... and not just running good? 10,000 hands, 50,000 hands, 100,000 hands?