That guy
03-18-2005, 04:21 PM
Negreanu made an interesting call on the river in a heads-up hand vs DW at Borgata. DN looked really dumb on that one but he seemed convinced DW had 78. Let's try to get inside the head of Negreanu and figure out why...
Negreanu appears to have a slight chip lead but its close (each with ~$3mm)
Blinds 30k/60k with $10k antes
DN calls on the button with K/images/graemlins/spade.gif2/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
DW checks in the BB with 9/images/graemlins/heart.gif9/images/graemlins/club.gif
Pot $140K
Flop 3/images/graemlins/spade.gif6/images/graemlins/spade.gif6/images/graemlins/club.gif
Both Check
Turn: 9/images/graemlins/spade.gif
DW checks
Negreanu bets $60k (~40% of the pot)
DW raises another $200k (pot-size raise)
Negreanu calls $140k
Pot: $540k
River: 6/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
DW bets $500k (~pot size)
Negreanu thinks and calls
-------------
It became pretty clear that Negreanu put DW squarely on 78
The check-raise on 4th street was the key bet. He just didn't believe DW would check-raise a 9... When Daniel calls the check-raise, he is trying to tell DW that he has something. Then DW bets $500k -- essentially ignoring Daniel showing strength by calling the check-raise. Now DN seems convinced that DW is bluffing. It seems like too big of a bet for a 9. What if Daniel had a bigger 9?
After thinking about this hand a bit, it seems like a more logical read by DN to say that DW is bluffing. DN's payoff would have looked like genius if it had worked. But how can DN be so sure on 78? I guess DW could have check-raised with a big spade too as a semi-bluff. But even a naked ace of spades beats DN.
What about A9? Couldn't DW have check-raised the turn with A9 or K9 or would he have just bet it to avoid letting Daniel get a free card?
What else does Daniel beat? Or was this just a bonehead call by DN?
Negreanu appears to have a slight chip lead but its close (each with ~$3mm)
Blinds 30k/60k with $10k antes
DN calls on the button with K/images/graemlins/spade.gif2/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
DW checks in the BB with 9/images/graemlins/heart.gif9/images/graemlins/club.gif
Pot $140K
Flop 3/images/graemlins/spade.gif6/images/graemlins/spade.gif6/images/graemlins/club.gif
Both Check
Turn: 9/images/graemlins/spade.gif
DW checks
Negreanu bets $60k (~40% of the pot)
DW raises another $200k (pot-size raise)
Negreanu calls $140k
Pot: $540k
River: 6/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
DW bets $500k (~pot size)
Negreanu thinks and calls
-------------
It became pretty clear that Negreanu put DW squarely on 78
The check-raise on 4th street was the key bet. He just didn't believe DW would check-raise a 9... When Daniel calls the check-raise, he is trying to tell DW that he has something. Then DW bets $500k -- essentially ignoring Daniel showing strength by calling the check-raise. Now DN seems convinced that DW is bluffing. It seems like too big of a bet for a 9. What if Daniel had a bigger 9?
After thinking about this hand a bit, it seems like a more logical read by DN to say that DW is bluffing. DN's payoff would have looked like genius if it had worked. But how can DN be so sure on 78? I guess DW could have check-raised with a big spade too as a semi-bluff. But even a naked ace of spades beats DN.
What about A9? Couldn't DW have check-raised the turn with A9 or K9 or would he have just bet it to avoid letting Daniel get a free card?
What else does Daniel beat? Or was this just a bonehead call by DN?