dabluebery
03-16-2005, 12:16 PM
I'm engaged in an intellectual debate with some poker friends of mine about the way to play a big stack / small stack when the chip ratios are say 7:1 or greater.
You know, such that the guy would have to double up at least twice to get things back to even, and many permutations of the argument.
What are the goals of both players? For example, we've basically agreed that the goal of a short stack is to double up.... and it might be necessary to take the worst of it, just to try. Is it a win-win situation for the small stack? If they lose, they were destined to, if they double up twice, it's the beginning of the "greatest comeback in poker history."
What's more daunting for the short stack? To double up quickly, or to play hand for hand, and slowly build up a bigger stack?
How does this change the goals of the big stack? What influence do the blinds have? How can you apply the theory of poker to fit these situations? And so on.
We've discussed quite a bit, but I'll reserve the rest for what anyone else might say. I don't want to bias anything, or narrow the scope of responses, because we're just a bunch of idiots shooting in the dark, and we definitely haven't thought of everyting.
Rob
You know, such that the guy would have to double up at least twice to get things back to even, and many permutations of the argument.
What are the goals of both players? For example, we've basically agreed that the goal of a short stack is to double up.... and it might be necessary to take the worst of it, just to try. Is it a win-win situation for the small stack? If they lose, they were destined to, if they double up twice, it's the beginning of the "greatest comeback in poker history."
What's more daunting for the short stack? To double up quickly, or to play hand for hand, and slowly build up a bigger stack?
How does this change the goals of the big stack? What influence do the blinds have? How can you apply the theory of poker to fit these situations? And so on.
We've discussed quite a bit, but I'll reserve the rest for what anyone else might say. I don't want to bias anything, or narrow the scope of responses, because we're just a bunch of idiots shooting in the dark, and we definitely haven't thought of everyting.
Rob