HDPM
10-02-2002, 06:36 PM
Here's a link to a story on the "Torch" Torricelli escapade. web page (http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=683&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20021002/ap_on_el_se/torricelli)
This is a ridiculous decision. The result is that candidates in trouble can be replaced on a whim to improve the chances of one party. It's fine to have a replacement in the event of the death of a candidate, but anything else is rub of the green IMO. I mean come on, the Torch had obvious ethical problems when he was nominated, but he was nominated by Democrats. Just because they nominated a loser is no reason to then let the loser quit and somehow justify it as preserving the two-party system. This decision undermines the two party system if anything.
OTOH, if the Republicans could have swapped out Ashcroft....
This is a ridiculous decision. The result is that candidates in trouble can be replaced on a whim to improve the chances of one party. It's fine to have a replacement in the event of the death of a candidate, but anything else is rub of the green IMO. I mean come on, the Torch had obvious ethical problems when he was nominated, but he was nominated by Democrats. Just because they nominated a loser is no reason to then let the loser quit and somehow justify it as preserving the two-party system. This decision undermines the two party system if anything.
OTOH, if the Republicans could have swapped out Ashcroft....