These blinds too high for NL???

[seahawktd]

Nearby, there is an Indian casino that hosts NL, but the blinds are $3-$5 with a min $100 and max $200 buy in. There is a maximum $500 bet too.

These blinds seem a bit high to me, considering the blinds at NL200 at pacific poker and farty poker are 1-2. Seems like the casino wants more rake money to me.

[Justin A]

This is somewhat standard. Usually places will have a 2/5 game with a max $200. That being said, some places are beginning to increase their buyins to the 100 big blind structure.

[David04]

I thought you said it was a NL game.

[brick]

yes, the blinds should be changed to 1-2 at tulalip.
And they should go to a time charge.
The poker room is run very poorly...

The whole "must move" thing in a NL game. Give me a break.
And can they deal any faster?

On the positive side, at least it's no smoking and at least they actually spread a NL game.

[seahawktd]

How's the game though?

[brick]

The game can be very soft of Fri and Sat night on the must move tables. Thats about all I know.

[fsuplayer]

the structure sucks, but playing is better than not I guess.

the bellagio has a similar structure and you really have to get to 500-600 to actually play poker, before that, its an all in fest.

[seahawktd]

[ QUOTE ]
The game can be very soft of Fri and Sat night on the must move tables. Thats about all I know.

[/ QUOTE ]

not to sound like an ignorant clown, but are the must move tables the tables that are not the main table?

[brick]

yeah, The players that play longer get slowly moved to the main table. As you can imagine this creates a situation where the newbies bust out and quit before making it to the main table.