PDA

View Full Version : 8-man pool via neteller? (or 16-man...


josie_wales
03-08-2005, 09:44 AM
Guys

You up for a pool for the NCAAs...a little different than a normal one

Each person gets equal teams, either 'draft style' or 'random style'

Then the teams you get must cover, or else you lose them to the other team.

Example:

I have Missouri as one of my teams
You have NC State as one of your teams

The line is Missouri (-8)

Final Score
Missouri 79
NC State 75

While missouri won and moves on, YOU now have missouri as NC State +8 wins with the spread.

Not really too much skill, but will keep everyone interested in the pool until the end.

Every will have a decent chance of winning.

These will work as long as we have a number of entrants that is able to be divided into 64 (2,4,8 etc)


What we could do is have anyone that wants in transfer $20 into one members neteller account. Then that member would send winnings to the winner.

We would just pick a trusted/respected member to hold the funds.

At $20 a man the winner would get $160 with 8 people in.
At $20 a man the winner would get $320 with 16 people in.

Actually, it would be a little less, after the neteller transfer fees.

But again, this would be really just to goof around, talk trash and have a little fun for just a $20 entry.

I am open to altering this/changing terms or to any ideas.

Lets get this together,

jw

bugstud
03-08-2005, 04:29 PM
interesting idea

ElSapo
03-08-2005, 05:47 PM
I'd be down for this...

josie_wales
03-08-2005, 06:33 PM
Cool.

Spread the word to those that you think might be into it.

Maybe a crosspost? I think we could get some people that usually arent into betting sports cause they know nothing.

This levels the field.

3 so far.

Any others?

jw

jamesburke
03-08-2005, 06:55 PM
count me in

iMsoLucky0
03-08-2005, 07:06 PM
Sounds like fun, PM me with more info when it becomes ready.

josie_wales
03-08-2005, 07:53 PM
Sweet, five and counting.

Keep em coming.

Any suggestions for how to do the "draft"?

jw

Sluss
03-09-2005, 06:20 PM
I think I understand. I'm in.