soah
03-07-2005, 06:28 PM
Party 5/10. I've played a few orbits and might appear TAG to anyone paying attention (although none of the pots I've been in have gotten very large or gone to showdown). I have one note on my opponent from a previous session which says he limped in and then called a preflop raise with AQ, check-called a Q88 flop, check-called a brick turn, and checked an ace river. So that's about all the information I have on him. Overall the table is playing fairly rationally -- none of that [censored] where if you raise preflop you can expect to get checkraised on the flop 85% of the time by any two cards, call all-in with any pair, etc.
So we're eight-handed atm and I limp UTG with 99. UTG+1 limps. Just us and the blinds see a flop of J97, two-tone. Checked to me, I bet $30, UTG+1 raises to $80. Blinds fold. I call.
Turn brick. I check, UTG+1 bets $100 into a $200 pot, I raise to $350.
River brick. I go all-in for $715.
Basically on the flop I'm thinking I'm ahead because he would have raised preflop with JJ, and he wasn't bad enough to limp with T8 UTG+1 (at least, I haven't seen him do anything like that). So I'm trying to get in as much money as possible. In retrospect though, the only hand he can really call $715 on the river with is 77 (and if he knows my play very well he would probably be correct to muck that as well, but he probably doesn't know me good enough to make that big of a laydown). Was it too greedy to try to double up in an unraised pot here?
Some alternate lines I considered were reraising on the flop (to like $220-250) and then betting out on the turn/river to get all-in, or doing a stop-n-go on any safe turn card. When I decided to check-raise the turn, I was assuming he'd bet like $150 instead of just $100, which would make it much easier for me to get him pot-committed.
Just curious what others think.
So we're eight-handed atm and I limp UTG with 99. UTG+1 limps. Just us and the blinds see a flop of J97, two-tone. Checked to me, I bet $30, UTG+1 raises to $80. Blinds fold. I call.
Turn brick. I check, UTG+1 bets $100 into a $200 pot, I raise to $350.
River brick. I go all-in for $715.
Basically on the flop I'm thinking I'm ahead because he would have raised preflop with JJ, and he wasn't bad enough to limp with T8 UTG+1 (at least, I haven't seen him do anything like that). So I'm trying to get in as much money as possible. In retrospect though, the only hand he can really call $715 on the river with is 77 (and if he knows my play very well he would probably be correct to muck that as well, but he probably doesn't know me good enough to make that big of a laydown). Was it too greedy to try to double up in an unraised pot here?
Some alternate lines I considered were reraising on the flop (to like $220-250) and then betting out on the turn/river to get all-in, or doing a stop-n-go on any safe turn card. When I decided to check-raise the turn, I was assuming he'd bet like $150 instead of just $100, which would make it much easier for me to get him pot-committed.
Just curious what others think.