Roy__Batty
03-04-2005, 01:21 PM
as i'm reading "Tournament Poker For Advanced Players" from sklansky, i read this (with my words):
If, as often, there's a bump in the prizes for those who reach the final table, u'll see the short stacks of the 2 last tables play extra tight.
That allows the chip leader to play/raise many more hands than usual, allowing him to increase significantly his chips position as long as the 2 tables situation goes on.
So, this may urges the chip leader of one table to make unusual plays, such as folding pocket queens after an early position all in by a small stack.
Yes calling may be a positive EV play BUT this could break the 2 tables and then stop a situation that was very positive for the chip leader.
Anybody have seen somebody make such a play (folding a big hand not to break the table)?
I like the idea but, to be honest, it doesn't look very realistic; I mean one of the smallish stacks will get busted quite quickly anyway, it's not like only the big stack could afford to call a short stack all in.
If, as often, there's a bump in the prizes for those who reach the final table, u'll see the short stacks of the 2 last tables play extra tight.
That allows the chip leader to play/raise many more hands than usual, allowing him to increase significantly his chips position as long as the 2 tables situation goes on.
So, this may urges the chip leader of one table to make unusual plays, such as folding pocket queens after an early position all in by a small stack.
Yes calling may be a positive EV play BUT this could break the 2 tables and then stop a situation that was very positive for the chip leader.
Anybody have seen somebody make such a play (folding a big hand not to break the table)?
I like the idea but, to be honest, it doesn't look very realistic; I mean one of the smallish stacks will get busted quite quickly anyway, it's not like only the big stack could afford to call a short stack all in.