Ethics Question

If there is a flaw in the software and a site allows you to sit out the blinds and come in behind the button for just the big blind is it good strategy or weak ethics to do so?

[MS Sunshine]

You guys that think like this make me sick. You only think about saving a little money. Would you want your children to play like this?

Next, you will be asking if it is alright to flop a set and check for a dirty play.

MS Sunshine

[Jeffage]

When you miss the blinds, and you want to post behind the button, you must post a live BB and a dead small blind. So, you save nothing.

Jeff

[redsimon]

not on ultimatebet you don't. /forums/images/icons/cool.gif

[Ryan_21]

That MS Sunshine is replying to a post about ethics and isnt it even funnier that he is condeming someone for having weak ethics.lol

Ryan_21

[Mike Haven]

Ethics?

ithn't that in the thtate of vermont?

[MS Sunshine]

It's a yoke, Ryan.

At one time, I saw grinding LV pros sit out the blinds, at $3-6, and post behind with a live $3 and a dead $1 in full ring games.

MS Sunshine

[Ryan_21]

Guess I didnt see the humor.

Ryan_21

[GrannyMae]

in a 9 handed game, you miss too many hands by taking advantage of this software flaw. now if the software was screwed up where you could come back in AS the button, then the argument would be different.

[Jimbo]

Granny,

In a 3/2 blind structure I believe it might be a good move. You exchange two hands with bad postion for 1 hand with prime positon for 60% of the cost. Seems like a deal I'd be willing to accept.

Jimbo

[GrannyMae]

i honest to god am not being a smartass here, but have you done the math on it?? i have not, but would think there is a big difference when it is 9 handed vs. 10 handed