Which two books?

[Zetack]

Mason says there are two 2+2 books that are frequently criticized for not being as good as they could be. Which two books are they?

--Zetack

[Freeway]

I was wondering that as well.

[jdl22]

TOP and either SCSFAP or HPFAP
/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

[phish]

I think Theory of Poker is excellent. The one 2+2 book I'm most disappointed in is High/Low (Omaha and Stud) for AP. The Omaha section is particularly weak.

[alfatcat]

Good place to ask this question would be the Books/Publications forum.


A REALLY good place to find the definitive answer to this question. (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1826831&page=1&view=c ollapsed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=3#Post1860862)

Oh, and I'm not trying to be one of those you're a loser if you haven't ready every post people, just saw this one recently and trying to help!