ordinaryboy
02-27-2005, 09:23 AM
I played 2 hands and this guy told me that i played them horribly, now i had my reasons but what this guy was saying was also sound reasoning.
1st scenario
I am in a pot with 1 all-in and 1 other guy who raised pre-flop.
flop comes AQx pre-flop raiser checks to me and i have 33.
Now because the all-in was a small stack i believed his range of hands to be wide. The pre-flop raiser had obviously missed the flop or he was slowplaying me, i believed him to have missed so i made a 2/3rds pot sized bet, which the pfr'er folded to and the small stack won with his Aq.
Now my logic was that if small stack had missed the flop i was in the lead and i didnt want the pfr'er to get free cards to beat my vulnerable pair, i can see how this logic may be flawed but if someone could explain a little bit better i would appreciate it. Incidentally i did the same an hour later and the small stack had missed the flop and this time my pocket 8's stood up. with the other guy moaning about how he would have won on the river.
2nd Scenario
6 handed blinds are fairly large 100/200
i have 600 in chips get dealt 99
big stack is SB with 3500 chips and there is no BB due to a player just leaving tourney.
I go all-in with my 99's and big stack calls with his 88's
and hits hit trips on turn.
Now the same player slated me for this play saying that it was stupid to go up against big stack for only 100. But i was gonna be hit by a 200 BB in 2 hands time. Also i find it good to go up against big stacks as they are more loose with hands they'll call as they have so many chips.
In the end i was a massive favourite, was my play good and/or should i continue to do this if it happens again.
thanks all
1st scenario
I am in a pot with 1 all-in and 1 other guy who raised pre-flop.
flop comes AQx pre-flop raiser checks to me and i have 33.
Now because the all-in was a small stack i believed his range of hands to be wide. The pre-flop raiser had obviously missed the flop or he was slowplaying me, i believed him to have missed so i made a 2/3rds pot sized bet, which the pfr'er folded to and the small stack won with his Aq.
Now my logic was that if small stack had missed the flop i was in the lead and i didnt want the pfr'er to get free cards to beat my vulnerable pair, i can see how this logic may be flawed but if someone could explain a little bit better i would appreciate it. Incidentally i did the same an hour later and the small stack had missed the flop and this time my pocket 8's stood up. with the other guy moaning about how he would have won on the river.
2nd Scenario
6 handed blinds are fairly large 100/200
i have 600 in chips get dealt 99
big stack is SB with 3500 chips and there is no BB due to a player just leaving tourney.
I go all-in with my 99's and big stack calls with his 88's
and hits hit trips on turn.
Now the same player slated me for this play saying that it was stupid to go up against big stack for only 100. But i was gonna be hit by a 200 BB in 2 hands time. Also i find it good to go up against big stacks as they are more loose with hands they'll call as they have so many chips.
In the end i was a massive favourite, was my play good and/or should i continue to do this if it happens again.
thanks all