The-Matador

[Danenania]

I actually think he is coming around.

[housenuts]

disagreed

[snowden719]

Not sure why people are such an ass to him, so he used to be a troll and isn't one now, give the man a break.

[bernie]

[ QUOTE ]
so he used to be a troll and isn't one now, give the man a break.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, he handled himself in his very recent 88 thread beautifully. Condescending and insulting, ever so nicely.

I have him on ignore for now.

b

[jason_t]

Try again (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1796149&page=&view=&s b=5&o=).

[Bulbarainey]

[ QUOTE ]
Try again (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1796149&page=&view=&s b=5&o=).

[/ QUOTE ]

what an ass, ive never seen anyone that rude on these forums

[bernie]

This is what I get:

*** You are ignoring this user ***

b

[bernie]

[ QUOTE ]
ive never seen anyone that rude on these forums

[/ QUOTE ]

Haven't been around here long, have ya? /images/graemlins/cool.gif

b

[NLSoldier]

I agree with the OP, I really dont have anything against the guy anymore.

[Bulbarainey]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ive never seen anyone that rude on these forums

[/ QUOTE ]

Haven't been around here long, have ya? /images/graemlins/cool.gif

b

[/ QUOTE ]

not really ^_-, but everyone here has been so helpful so far, and +EV!

[emil3000]

He's a fun fellow. He replies too much though. Says the same thing over and over. That's why that 88 post got so long. Not too interesting a topic really.

[Dangergirl]

I thought he was a she??

[zephed56]

[ QUOTE ]
Not sure why people are such an ass to him, so he used to be a troll and isn't one now, give the man a break.

[/ QUOTE ]
He still acts like an arrogant prick. In his own hand posts no less.

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not sure why people are such an ass to him, so he used to be a troll and isn't one now, give the man a break.

[/ QUOTE ]
He still acts like an arrogant prick. In his own hand posts no less.

[/ QUOTE ]

Acts like?

[Chobohoya]

[ QUOTE ]

Acts like?

[/ QUOTE ]

lol well played. Too bad most of the time you just look like an idiot. I'm sure you can up the consistency.

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
Try again (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1796149&page=&view=&s b=5&o=).

[/ QUOTE ]

This (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=smallholdem&Number=1796497 &Forum=,All_Forums,&Words=&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&M ain=1796149&Search=true&where=&Name=4001&daterange =&newerval=&newertype=&olderval=&oldertype=&bodypr ev=#Post1796497) was by far the best post in that entire thread.

[Dead]

Nah, it hasn't changed.

It's just as caustic as before.

[Dead]

[ QUOTE ]
Not sure why people are such an ass to him, so he used to be a troll and isn't one now, give the man a break.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're probably another Matador account.

[Voltron87]

He just started an idiotic thread about the merits of NL Holdem. I hope he stops posting.

[Dead]

It won't. It's like a [censored] virus. After it gets embarrassed and shunned enough it just leaves and comes back under a new name. It then starts a new post, and seems nice for the first 4 or 5 posts. But once someone questions it, watch out! It then turns from newbie poster into the evil Matador/CinnamonWind/Lansing/Sophia/Puppykicker creature.

[DMBFan23]

Here's another good one where she makes outrageous claims like she invented the question mark

Owned (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=1804875&page=0&view=colla psed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=1)

[Dead]

This is why you pwn DMB.

How's 1/2 6max?

[DMBFan23]

playing that and 2/4. 1/2 6 max is good, the players are bad and I'm running about as predicted. I play more 2/4 full though, and it's going well so far. I'm running at an unsustainable rate, so the crash from that will be fun. I dropped to a single table when I play 2/4, but I 3 or 4-table the 1/2 6 max, so that might make a difference.

[Reef]

[ QUOTE ]
Here's another good one where she makes outrageous claims like she invented the question mark

Owned (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=1804875&page=0&view=colla psed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=1)

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, here's one from the Matador:

[ QUOTE ]
8.36 at 2-4 this month, actually.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm guessing he played about 1k hands max.

[IndieMatty]

I couldn't care less, but really high win rates over say 5k hands are possible.. I had some ridiculously high numbers when I started by serious play in August. mid teens at the Party 2/4/3/6 and then 15/30 over my first 10,000 hands....

It's luck...but it happens.

Now that i hit 50,000 hands....well not so good. heh.

[DMBFan23]

I'm also running higher than is sustainable at 2/4, but pwn3dbitch claims these winrates over large sample sizes.

[Freakin]

[ QUOTE ]
I actually think he is coming around.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. I've got no complaints... I don't mind one person consistently being an ass, cause then I know what to expect. When they start creating new accounts and catch me off guard, then I get pissed. I find him amusing.

Freakin

[billyjex]

At least the posters on here with huge egos have earned their stripes by being on these boards for years and earning the respect to have that cockiness.

Matador is full of [censored].

In one thread he brags about his winrates, ~8 at 2/4, ~5 at 3/6, ~3 at 5/10. Why doesn't he just play 5/10 to maximize his profits if he's so good at it?

[Dead]

Its winrates are obviously falsified. /images/graemlins/crazy.gif It's important to note that we aren't really sure if Matador is a he or a she. It's claimed both on many different occasions, and making a name like Sophia really makes you wonder. Our Matador is very disturbed, that's for sure.

[[censored]]

[ QUOTE ]
Try again (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1796149&page=&view=&s b=5&o=).

[/ QUOTE ]

He may be a jerk but a few of the others' obsession with responding to everything he posts is just as douche worthy.

[James282]

Honestly, he's a pathological liar, but I am willing to give him a totally clean slate if he owns up to being Hulk Hogan.
-James

[[censored]]

[ QUOTE ]
Here's another good one where she makes outrageous claims like she invented the question mark

Owned (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=1804875&page=0&view=colla psed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=1)

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude you got YOU got [censored] owned in that thread why would you link to it?

[Danenania]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Try again (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1796149&page=&view=&s b=5&o=).

[/ QUOTE ]

He may be a jerk but a few of the others' obsession with responding to everything he posts is just as douche worthy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I agree with this. I think the people who follow trolls around to harass them, especially when they are making pretty legitimate posts, are way more pathetic than the trolls.

[Danenania]

[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, he's a pathological liar, but I am willing to give him a totally clean slate if he owns up to being Hulk Hogan.
-James

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think he is Hulk Hogan. The tone of CinnamonWind was extremely similar to Matador (I didn't really read any of the posts from his other aliases) but Hogan seems like too much of a dumb ass to be the same guy.

[DMBFan23]

[ QUOTE ]

Dude you got YOU got [censored] owned in that thread why would you link to it?

[/ QUOTE ]

false.

[[censored]]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Dude you got YOU got [censored] owned in that thread why would you link to it?

[/ QUOTE ]

false.

[/ QUOTE ]

He post a winrate you call him a liar, he post evidence of winrate and you call him a liar. Yeah you owned him alright.

[Ricky Slade]

[ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/crazy.gif It's important to note that we aren't really sure if Matador is a he or a she. It's claimed both on many different occasions, and making a name like Sophia really makes you wonder. Our Matador is very disturbed, that's for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

hmmm... Shemale???

[Voltron87]

I find him amusing, but not in a way that makes me respect him for his intellect.

[B Dids]

[ QUOTE ]
8.36 at 2-4 this month, actually.

[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]

I'm guessing he played about 1k hands max.

[/ QUOTE ]


I have 2.8K hands of 8.9BB/100 for 2/4 6 max in my db. It's not impossible.

[bernie]

[ QUOTE ]
He may be a jerk but a few of the others' obsession with responding to everything he posts is just as douche worthy.

[/ QUOTE ]

I tend to agree. Why keep bumping the threads up by responding?

b

[theredwave]

Those numbers can be filtered pretty easily and he did just cut those lines out only. It would be more believable if he posted a full screenshot of PT to show that nothing has been tampered with. He's lied to us before, what's to stop him from doing it again?

[[censored]]

[ QUOTE ]
Those numbers can be filtered pretty easily and he did just cut those lines out only. It would be more believable if he posted a full screenshot of PT to show that nothing has been tampered with. He's lied to us before, what's to stop him from doing it again?

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh I'm not saying the stats are legit. I'm saying that having the need to call them out and not being able to figure out that you are only giving him the opportunity to post some type of made up evidence is hardly owning someone.

The winrates may be completely false or just a short term anomaly, I don't know and I don't care.

[jason_t]

[ QUOTE ]
He may be a jerk but a few of the others' obsession with responding to everything he posts is just as douche worthy.

[/ QUOTE ]

There aren't many people who do this (two come to mind); most of the rest of the people responding to his replies start sincerely, but then The-Matador replies as a prick and the whole thread degenerates into insult swapping.

[Dead]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Dude you got YOU got [censored] owned in that thread why would you link to it?

[/ QUOTE ]

false.

[/ QUOTE ]

He post a winrate you call him a liar, he post evidence of winrate and you call him a liar. Yeah you owned him alright.

[/ QUOTE ]

You obviously know nothing about PT, and it's not surprising, considering you post 99% of your posts in OOT. All you have to do is filter out winning sessions and then re-calculate.

Just as I thought. After searching your posts you have like one relating to poker. 99.9% of them are in OOT. Have you ever used PT? If not then don't comment on it.

[[censored]]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Dude you got YOU got [censored] owned in that thread why would you link to it?

[/ QUOTE ]

false.

[/ QUOTE ]

He post a winrate you call him a liar, he post evidence of winrate and you call him a liar. Yeah you owned him alright.

[/ QUOTE ]

You obviously know nothing about PT, and it's not surprising, considering you post 99% of your posts in OOT. All you have to do is filter out winning sessions and then re-calculate.

Just as I thought. After searching your posts you have like one relating to poker. 99.9% of them are in OOT. Have you ever used PT? If not then don't comment on it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Again that fact that a dim witt like yourself felt compelled to prove something as obvious as a 8.66bb/100 win rate false when it was blately obvious is where the true owning took place. That you could not anticipate the PT screen shots is just funny.

But please continue to follow him around from thread to thread "owning" him. It's certainly bound to work at some point.

[Dead]

Keep sticking up for the thing. It won't win you any friends around here though. And I'm not the one who tried to prove it false. DMB did. But yes I do think that it is false.

[[censored]]

[ QUOTE ]
Keep sticking up for the thing. It won't win you any friends around here though. And I'm not the one who tried to prove it false. DMB did. But yes I do think that it is false.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not trying to stick up for The Matador. I am saying that responding to the obviously false or misleading claims from a troll is nowhere near owning them. Bragging about it and linking to it in another thread is even weaker IMO.

[Dead]

I never did any of that.

And I never said that I owned the Matador. The thing is the one who always talks about owning people.

[DMBFan23]

dude why you sweating me. I didn't "follow around" sh**, I just pointed out the obvious. lame? you just commented on the dude that comments on the troll. so that makes you a bitch. now YOU got served.

BTW...in case you were wondering what the actual outcome of that thread was...



http://img237.exs.cx/img237/4205/bb7jx.jpg

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
Those numbers can be filtered pretty easily and he did just cut those lines out only. It would be more believable if he posted a full screenshot of PT to show that nothing has been tampered with. He's lied to us before, what's to stop him from doing it again?

[/ QUOTE ]

I just got back from a 14 hour BM marathon, so I'm a little groggy, but ask and ye shall receive ...

http://www.geocities.com/malakyekanatatsu/WinratesFeb.jpg

Sadly, my 2-4 rate has slipped a bit as a result of some poor play. I'll get it back up soon.

As I posted in the SS thread, here is my cashout history for February:

http://www.geocities.com/malakyekanatatsu/FebCashHistory.jpg

Now someone on here thinks what I did was drop like 5 grand into my poker account before this, then withdrew it all incrementally during the month, then filtered my winrates to support my "wild" claims.

You, sir, are a douchebag.

I'm sorry if my awesome February fills you with angst, but there's nothing I can do about that. In the SS forum, I was actually posting to encourage people, because we see about 100 "I'm on a massive downswing, help me please" whines a day on these boards. I figured a little positivity (and yes, some vanity) was not going to hurt anyone. Apparently, it offended you deeply, and for that I am truly not sorry. So some dope wants to be a dipshit about things, I prove him wrong and he still won't give up ... what can I do? Except continue to be right, that is.

And finally, Dead, I hope you remember the last time you called me a liar. Remember that? Remember when you told me you didn't believe I had a Ph.D, then I posted excerpts from my thesis, then you asked me some utterly idiotic questions about the thesis, and I told you how stupid you were, and you had to shut up because you were so very, very wrong? Remember that (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=exchange&Number=1788353&Fo rum=,,,,,All_Forums,,,,,&Words=&Searchpage=5&Limit =25&Main=1786946&Search=true&where=bodysub&Name=26 962&daterange=1&newerval=1&newertype=w&olderval=&o ldertype=&bodyprev=#Post1788353) ? Yeah I figured you might.

So in conclusion, no matter how many times you SAY I'm not being truthful, it doesn't make you right. I've proved it here, there, and I can prove it everywhere, so I invite you to keep calling me a liar.

TM

[partygirluk]

I really don't like you, but it is pretty clear that you are telling the truth about your winrates in February. You only did that post for reasons of ego, but it does not change that you are almost certainly telling the truth, and that you did indeed own DMBfan in that thread.

BTW, your screenshot does not hide your Party hand. Do you see why?

BTW, I am pretty sure you have the academic qualifications you claim. Just read the thread you linked to. You said a PhD akes 2 years in England. That is not accurate. 3 years is really the minimum. Which college did you go to?

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
I really don't like you, but it is pretty clear that you are telling the truth about your winrates in February. You only did that post for reasons of ego, but it does not change that you are almost certainly telling the truth, and that you did indeed own DMBfan in that thread.

BTW, sophia867, your screenshot does not hide your Party hand. Do you see why?

BTW, I am pretty sure you have the academic qualifications you claim. Just read the thread you linked to. You said a PhD akes 2 years in England. That is not accurate. 3 years is really the minimum. Which college did you go to?

[/ QUOTE ]

Went to Cambridge. If you get an M.Phil before your Ph.D (I did) then you get a Ph.D in 2 years in the Arts. Generally sciences and, well, actual academic disciplines like that take longer, but for me it was 3 years from arrival to thesis defence.

No, I don't see why the screen does not hide my party name.

[partygirluk]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really don't like you, but it is pretty clear that you are telling the truth about your winrates in February. You only did that post for reasons of ego, but it does not change that you are almost certainly telling the truth, and that you did indeed own DMBfan in that thread.

BTW, sophia867, your screenshot does not hide your Party hand. Do you see why?

BTW, I am pretty sure you have the academic qualifications you claim. Just read the thread you linked to. You said a PhD akes 2 years in England. That is not accurate. 3 years is really the minimum. Which college did you go to?

[/ QUOTE ]

Went to Cambridge. If you get am M.Phil before your Ph.D (I did) then you get a Ph.D in 2 years in the Arts. Generally sciences and, well, actual academic disciplines like that take longer, but for me it was 3 years from arrival to thesis defence.

No, I don't see why the screen does not hide my party name.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I meant, which college at Cambridge?

You have not blocked out the hand numbers on your PT screenshot, so anyone can request the hand no. and hey presto.

[The-Matador]

First thank you very much for pointing that out. I really appreciate it, and it would be swell if you didn't share my Party name (if you even bother to get it).

Next, I went to Trinity Hall.

[The-Matadork]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really don't like you, but it is pretty clear that you are telling the truth about your winrates in February. You only did that post for reasons of ego, but it does not change that you are almost certainly telling the truth, and that you did indeed own DMBfan in that thread.

BTW, sophia867, your screenshot does not hide your Party hand. Do you see why?

BTW, I am pretty sure you have the academic qualifications you claim. Just read the thread you linked to. You said a PhD akes 2 years in England. That is not accurate. 3 years is really the minimum. Which college did you go to?

[/ QUOTE ]

Went to Cambridge. If you get am M.Phil before your Ph.D (I did) then you get a Ph.D in 2 years in the Arts. Generally sciences and, well, actual academic disciplines like that take longer, but for me it was 3 years from arrival to thesis defence.

No, I don't see why the screen does not hide my party name.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I meant, which college at Cambridge?

You have not blocked out the hand numbers on your PT screenshot, so anyone can request the hand no. and hey presto.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ni han

[The-Matador]

Wtf are you?

[partygirluk]

[ QUOTE ]
First thank you very much for pointing that out. I really appreciate it, and it would be swell if you didn't share my Party name (if you even bother to get it).

Next, I went to Trinity Hall.

[/ QUOTE ]

I got offered an Mphil, but it was @ Girton College so I figured I'd go travelling instead /images/graemlins/smile.gif Plus I would really like to do my Masters in N.America, maybe @ McGill.

[The-Matador]

Girton's nice. Don't be a college snob! :P

McGill is really awesome. Montreal is the best.

If you're staying in the UK though, go to Cam. It's like a freaking golden ticket there. I personally thought my education was vastly overrated, but the brits really dig on Cambridge and Oxford. A degree from one of those places and you're really set anywhere in the world, but particularly England. Once again, Girton's cool, imho.

[partygirluk]

The location sucks.

[[censored]]

So basically he does follow you around from thread to thread. I figured as much.