natedogg
02-25-2005, 02:21 AM
It's not always just to protect ourselves from threats, but to prevent other parts of the world from escalating themselves into a nuclear exchange, which would be at the very least economically bad for us, and everyone.
Maybe North Korea will not nuke us, and will not give away their weapons to people who will, but they might just nuke one of our friends, and they may incite a regional nuke race.
This interesting analysis at http://www.techcentralstation.com/022205D.html discusses the possibility that Japan will go nuclear in response to North Korea's nuke. The article notes that Japan has the tech capability to build a nuke in SIX WEEKS FROM SCRATCH.
Japan's willingness to do so is not just conjecture, as the article point out that Japan's parliament has already begun discussing abandoning the article (9?) in their constitution that prohibits themselves from building a military....
Maybe we should have been a little more proactive about North Korea's nukes?
natedogg
Maybe North Korea will not nuke us, and will not give away their weapons to people who will, but they might just nuke one of our friends, and they may incite a regional nuke race.
This interesting analysis at http://www.techcentralstation.com/022205D.html discusses the possibility that Japan will go nuclear in response to North Korea's nuke. The article notes that Japan has the tech capability to build a nuke in SIX WEEKS FROM SCRATCH.
Japan's willingness to do so is not just conjecture, as the article point out that Japan's parliament has already begun discussing abandoning the article (9?) in their constitution that prohibits themselves from building a military....
Maybe we should have been a little more proactive about North Korea's nukes?
natedogg