PDA

View Full Version : JTs in MP at a *very* tight table (mixing it up a bit).


Entity
02-22-2005, 05:39 PM
Table has been running tighter than a thing that is very tight, as bison might say. Many hands folded to blind vs. blind battles. I'm getting up to leave shortly; this is my last orbit.

I, if anyone else has been paying attention, have a rockish image. I've shown down AQs, AKs, AA, KK, and QQ in the last hour.

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (10 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with T/images/graemlins/club.gif, J/images/graemlins/club.gif. MP2 posts a blind of $3.
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>...

rmarotti
02-22-2005, 05:42 PM
I think this is totally cool at a tight table.

ErrantNight
02-22-2005, 05:50 PM
who doesn't love to open-raise JTs? anyone?

brettbrettr
02-22-2005, 05:56 PM
I think its fine. Of course you lose the loosening-up factor this hand might have if you show it down since you're leaving. But given your image, why not?

JoshuaD
02-22-2005, 06:00 PM
[ QUOTE ]
who doesn't love to open-raise JTs? anyone?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because I love it doesn't mean it's right. /images/graemlins/frown.gif

TripleH68
02-22-2005, 06:11 PM
I'd be mucking my ATo from the CO.

runa
02-22-2005, 06:21 PM
If I recall its correct to open raise with JTs from hijack seat on normal tables so with the table conditions + your image to adjust for it I think its fine. Does MP2 posting have any direct bearing on the situation? People give you more credit for a solid hand since on average we expect MP2 to call with anything reasonable and the rest to fold; and I expect MP2 is likely to dump it on the flop if missed, thus maintaining your image?

sfer
02-22-2005, 06:27 PM
I'd be raising much, much lighter than JTs.

Clarkmeister
02-23-2005, 10:20 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Table has been running tighter than a thing that is very tight, as bison might say. Many hands folded to blind vs. blind battles. I'm getting up to leave shortly; this is my last orbit.

I, if anyone else has been paying attention, have a rockish image. I've shown down AQs, AKs, AA, KK, and QQ in the last hour.

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (10 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with T/images/graemlins/club.gif, J/images/graemlins/club.gif. MP2 posts a blind of $3.
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>...

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course.

Schizo
02-24-2005, 04:40 AM
[ QUOTE ]
hijack seat

[/ QUOTE ]

= CO ?? Button???

The-Matador
02-24-2005, 04:41 AM
How the hell is this "mixing it up"? This is an auto raise at a tight table.

Nate tha' Great
02-24-2005, 04:42 AM
Completely standard. I could have put a hand like this in the quiz.

Schizo
02-24-2005, 04:43 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I'd be raising much, much lighter than JTs.

[/ QUOTE ]

How light would you go on this uber tight table?

dblgutshot
02-24-2005, 05:20 AM
What about UTG or UTG+1?

raise, limp, fold?

What about at a loose table opposed to a tight table?

Shillx
02-24-2005, 05:24 AM
I have raised much much lighter in this spot. This is standard issue dude.

Brad

SCfuji
02-24-2005, 05:51 AM
this coming from mr. sedimentary /images/graemlins/smile.gif

SCfuji
02-24-2005, 05:53 AM
so would open raising 89s from MP be okay? i mean at a tight table wont you just be called or reraised with hands that slaughter you anyways? im konphused

Schizo
02-26-2005, 10:03 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
hijack seat

[/ QUOTE ]

= CO ?? Button???

[/ QUOTE ]

bumping question

btspider
02-26-2005, 10:14 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
hijack seat

[/ QUOTE ]

= CO ?? Button???

[/ QUOTE ]

bumping question

[/ QUOTE ]

seat to the right of CO.. typically MP3.

sthief09
02-26-2005, 10:18 PM
I'd make this raise at a loose table too. you have a good volume hand and a good hand in general. it hits a lot of flops so it's a great hand to have the lead with

Emmitt2222
02-26-2005, 10:35 PM
I'm really interested to know what limits you are playing Entity, did you just go from .5/1 to 1/2 6max, the to 2/4 and 3/6 for about 2k hands each, and very soon you will be at 5/10 6max? This boggles the mind, even if it is only partialy accurate.

BottlesOf
02-26-2005, 10:45 PM
WTF

BottlesOf
02-26-2005, 10:46 PM
IMHO, The fact that you think this is "mixing it up" or post worthy means we need to re-examine our MP opening standards a bit.

Entity
02-26-2005, 10:58 PM
[ QUOTE ]
IMHO, The fact that you think this is "mixing it up" or post worthy means we need to re-examine our MP opening standards a bit.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't normally open with JTs. I consider 77+, QTs+, K9s+ easy openraises there -- I just haven't had a lot of experience with JTs and T9s in the same context.

Rob

Entity
02-26-2005, 11:02 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I'm really interested to know what limits you are playing Entity, did you just go from .5/1 to 1/2 6max, the to 2/4 and 3/6 for about 2k hands each, and very soon you will be at 5/10 6max? This boggles the mind, even if it is only partialy accurate.

[/ QUOTE ]

More or less. I'm playing at the Stars 2/4 6max a lot right now, and will move up to their 3/6 game when I feel ready, maybe in another 5k or so hands. Then I'm hoping to give 5/10 6m a shot, but I need to learn to deal with swings better before I give that game a shot.

sthief09
02-26-2005, 11:12 PM
[ QUOTE ]
IMHO, The fact that you think this is "mixing it up" or post worthy means we need to re-examine our MP opening standards a bit.

[/ QUOTE ]

this coming from a bona fide preflop nit

sthief09
02-26-2005, 11:13 PM
Entity is really, really, really good, at least that's what I gather from his posts

bakku
02-26-2005, 11:24 PM
[ QUOTE ]
WTF

[/ QUOTE ]

He doesn't like money.

Nick C
02-27-2005, 01:52 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I'd be mucking my ATo from the CO.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he's saying he would fold ATo from the CO after Entity open-raised from MP1 with his JTs.

SparkyDog
02-27-2005, 02:23 AM
Too tight. With table conditions like he's describing, I'd raise about 30% of hands.

gaming_mouse
02-27-2005, 03:14 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Completely standard. I could have put a hand like this in the quiz.

[/ QUOTE ]

What quiz?

Schizo
02-28-2005, 02:50 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Completely standard. I could have put a hand like this in the quiz.

[/ QUOTE ]

What quiz?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he is talking about this thread:

I could be wrong though. (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&amp;Board=holdem&amp;Number=1767198&amp;fpar t=1&amp;PHPSESSID=)

Schizo
02-28-2005, 02:55 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Entity is really, really, really good, at least that's what I gather from his posts

[/ QUOTE ]

Three really's, that is a lot of really's.

Emmitt2222
02-28-2005, 02:59 AM
He deserves all those really's. Have you read a lot of his posts? He is one of the best in Micro/SS.

Next GoT.

lehighguy
02-28-2005, 04:10 AM
Preflop means nothing if you don't have a postflop plan. How did the rest of the hand go postflop.

Speculative hands like J10s are about postflop (well the whole game is). Post some postflop hands.

Entity
02-28-2005, 04:13 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Preflop means nothing if you don't have a postflop plan. How did the rest of the hand go postflop.

Speculative hands like J10s are about postflop (well the whole game is). Post some postflop hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

The hand was a yawner postflop. I got 3-bet by a tightish and unimaginative/passive 3-bettor. I flopped top pair and check-called the flop HU. I turned trips and checkraised, and he called down with AA, MHIG (I would have bet the turn intending on a 3-bet if he had not been so damned passive; he's the type to bet an overpair but not raise it).

There are countless other scenarios that could have happened postflop, and I was getting myself ready -- if 3-bet, how do I react? Postflop, though, this one was about as simple as they get.

As far as "preflop being boring, post some postflop hands...blah blah blah..." I do that all the time. I'm expanding my preflop raises in situations I'm not quite used to, though, hence me asking this question.

Rob

jt1
02-28-2005, 04:21 AM
I haven't read the other replies, but I'm thinking that this is standard with a normal to tight table. I'd raise 45s UTG in a tight table.

Schizo
02-28-2005, 06:19 AM
[ QUOTE ]
He deserves all those really's. Have you read a lot of his posts? He is one of the best in Micro/SS.

Next GoT.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I am well aware that Entity rocks. Just thought it was funny, that's all.