PDA

View Full Version : Bad Beats or Leaky?


Maulik
02-21-2005, 03:45 AM
I've been multitabling, I've beat $1/2 no problem, so $2/4 is the next logical movement. I can't beat it.

I play 5/10, play tight and win (notice word choice). I don't know what to do. Where to look, I'm getting PokerTracker tomorrow, but I'm confused, I just don't know where to look.

/images/graemlins/mad.gif

cold_cash
02-21-2005, 03:57 AM
What?

pokerkai
02-21-2005, 04:14 AM
[ QUOTE ]
What?

[/ QUOTE ]

Shillx
02-21-2005, 04:17 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

syphlix
02-21-2005, 04:29 AM
umm... what kind of post is this?... i don't even know what you're asking?... is this a joke?

w/out reading further... i'd say that it's a combination of the 2... Bad Leaks...

2000Flushes
02-21-2005, 06:01 AM
1st Read some books if you haven't. If you have read or skimmed just 1 or 2 go back reread them, and maybe get a few more. Winning Low Limit Hold'Em (Lee Jones) I think is a great beginners book, and Hold'em for Advanced Players (Sklansky and Malmuth) would be a good start

2nd Pick a game that suits your bankroll and stick with it. Ideally you want 300-500 BB for your limit. This means to play $3/$6 you want a $1800-$3000 bankroll. Don't jump from 1/2 to 3/6 to 5/10 etc. These games will play differently, also don't jump from 6 person to 10 person tables (you didnt mention this but just incase)

3rd Get pokertracker NOW and ALWAYS use it. EVERY session before playing any hands set it to auto request hands. You need to build a decent sample size of hands before any real information can be taken from this so START IT NOW!

Then come here, post hands where you weren't sure what to do, or think you played it wrong.

GL

Maulik
02-21-2005, 04:40 PM
Thanks. What is a decent statistically significant sample size?

deadmunny
02-21-2005, 04:51 PM
at an absolut minimum 10,000 hands,


Regards D