15/30 tabels at Party

[Nice_Guy]

I was just at a table with several people who were talking about blatant team play at the 15/30 tables at Party. Both of them said they avoided the 15/30 tables for this reason.

I usually ignore this kind of talk but these guys were pretty convincing.

I'm currently working my way up the levels at Party (limit hold'em). My next move is to 15/30 so I'd like to know if this is a common perception of the 15/30 tables at Party or if these guys were just the same old "internet poker is rigged" wackos.

Thanks

[sumdumguy]

They are wackos.. or the teams really suck.

[surfdoc]

I am sure there is a sick amout of cheating going on. That is why the games are so hard to beat. I also hear their collusion software is crap. You will have better luck and games on stars.

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
I am sure there is a sick amout of cheating going on.


[/ QUOTE ]

How are you sure?

[ QUOTE ]
You will have better luck and games on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

So, you are saying one will do better to play the $15/$30 on Stars than on Party?

Yikes.

[TobDog]

According to posts here(based on level of difficulty), party with occasional cheaters(if thats happening) is easier than Stars with no cheating.

[sthief09]

let me guess... that stakes at the game you were playing were lower than 15/30

"I could've fuc[/i]ked a supermodel but she wasn't my type"

[Nice_Guy]

[ QUOTE ]
You will have better luck and games on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd believe the wackos before I'd believe this.

Thanks all. Just wanted reassurance.

Simon

[nongice626]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am sure there is a sick amout of cheating going on.


[/ QUOTE ]

How are you sure?

[ QUOTE ]
You will have better luck and games on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

So, you are saying one will do better to play the $15/$30 on Stars than on Party?

Yikes.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cola. Do you understand this concept:
























FVCKING SATIRE?

[AngryCola]

Yes.

I understand that concept.

But the post I was talking about was not satire.
If it was supposed to be, he failed miserably.

Btw, I don't really care if your thread in OOT is supposed to be satire. It's still stupid.
And you probably won't be on this site very much longer because of it.

[nongice626]

[ QUOTE ]
Yes.

I understand that concept.

But the post I was talking about was not satire.

Btw, I don't really care if your thread in OOT is supposed to be satire. It's still stupid.
And you probably won't be on this site very much longer because of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

the post you were replying to was satire. he didnt fail. youre just an idiot.

[AngryCola]

Then I'll say it again.

If it's supposed to be satire, he failed miserably.

*EDIT*
Darn. The troll called me an idiot.
Now my feelings are hurt.

[nongice626]

maybe you'd have gotten it if he included a smiley face.