PDA

View Full Version : What's more annoying?

Patrick Duffy
02-15-2005, 06:28 PM
a player who goes all-in for 1300 when there are 70 chips in the pot?

or

a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?
Bigwig
02-15-2005, 06:49 PM
[ QUOTE ]
a player who goes all-in for 1300 when there are 70 chips in the pot?

or

a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

Minimum bettors.
Pokerscott
02-15-2005, 06:54 PM
[ QUOTE ]
a player who goes all-in for 1300 when there are 70 chips in the pot?

or

a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

A guy to your right that steals as much as you want to...
raptor517
02-15-2005, 06:55 PM
spot on. min betters.
Mr_J
02-15-2005, 06:57 PM
minraisers are worse...
gr8vertical
02-15-2005, 07:29 PM
I guess the first one, because I never min. raise /images/graemlins/grin.gif
lorinda
02-15-2005, 07:31 PM
a player who check-raises all-in after your minimum bet?

This is usually what I want him to do /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

Lori
citanul
02-15-2005, 07:53 PM
Why would either of these annoy you?

In my ongoing, but infrequent attempt to make the forum more valuable by harassing people who post stupid things, I ask you to please consider your post, and try to figure out if there was any value to it at all. In specific, was there any way that anyone was supposed to "get anything" out of your post, youreelf included?

citanul
Phoenix1010
02-15-2005, 07:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
A guy to your right that steals as much as you want to...

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.