Which is better, Pokertracker or Statking? [Archive]

View Full Version : Which is better, Pokertracker or Statking?

A_C_Slater

02-13-2005, 12:38 AM

In Matthew Hilger's 'Internet Texas Hold em' he recommends using Statking, but I notice the overwhelming majority on here use Pokertracker. What is the difference between the two? Does it matter?

BusterStacks

02-13-2005, 01:00 AM

PT > *

End of thread.

theredwave

02-13-2005, 01:43 AM

[ QUOTE ]
What is the difference between the two? Does it matter?

[/ QUOTE ]

Care to expand upon your answer Buster? Personally I've only used PT and PokerOffice and PokerTracker was clearly the best choice as it offered a lot more stats than PO and also was supported by more sites. I haven't heard much about Statking though.

balkii

02-13-2005, 05:32 AM

statking only keeps win/loss records.

PT keeps those but much much more.

B&M results however cannot be entered into PT.

they are really different programs with different purposes but happen to have some overlap. I use both.

BusterStacks

02-13-2005, 06:14 AM

Eh, I can't really expand on it. I saw statking over at balkii's and it looked hella gay, plus you have to pay for it. I guess I would use it if it was free, but for the price, whether it be 5$ or 50$ (I dont know), I would rather just use an Excel spreadsheet. Which I don't do.