LeeW
02-12-2005, 06:14 AM
I have heard a lot of people saying that they feel some top tournament players owe some of their success to the fact that they have staked many players in the events they play in.
Although only one that I have heard of actually forbids his horses to check-raise him, it is reasonable to assume that these people who rely on you to buy them into the tournaments might not play as aggressively against you as they otherwise would have.
How much of an advantage would it be to have ten horses in a 300 player field?
Although only one that I have heard of actually forbids his horses to check-raise him, it is reasonable to assume that these people who rely on you to buy them into the tournaments might not play as aggressively against you as they otherwise would have.
How much of an advantage would it be to have ten horses in a 300 player field?