Bill Kolter
02-11-2005, 02:22 PM
Help me out here. I'm learning Hold'em, and I have a pretty good handle on how to calculate outs vs. pot odds. But I'm having a hard time
putting players on hands and calculating whether I'm an underdog.
Here's an example from the WPT. Chip Reese, Barry Greenstein, and an amateur named James Tippin were playing. Reese had K-6, Greenstein A-K, and Tippin Q-Q, and all three were all-in.
The TV screen indicated that Tippin was favored 50-33-17.
So I ask, "How do I figure this at the table on the fly?"
I suppose, if I'm Tippin, I first have to guess what my opponents have. Then I have to figure the odds of Greenstein catching an ace or a king (or an ace AND a king, or two aces, or two kings, etc.) vs. the odds of Reese catching 2 sixes vs. the odds of Tippin NOT catching a queen, and then comparing that to the payoff. Then again, maybe this "underdog" calculation takes into account the odds of everybody improving. I don't know, but it gives me a headache.
Or I can just look at the queens and go, "How pretty. I call." Tippin busted out, by the way, when Greenstein caught an ace AND a king, but according to the math, he made a good call. At least, that's what Vince Van Patten thought. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't lay down queens in that situation.
Can anybody help me out here? This "underdog-overdog" thing is driving me nuts. Figuring my odds of hitting a hand is easy. Figuring against an opponent seems a lot tougher, and against two opponents, I'll need Microsoft Excel. What is the proper method to calculate this?
putting players on hands and calculating whether I'm an underdog.
Here's an example from the WPT. Chip Reese, Barry Greenstein, and an amateur named James Tippin were playing. Reese had K-6, Greenstein A-K, and Tippin Q-Q, and all three were all-in.
The TV screen indicated that Tippin was favored 50-33-17.
So I ask, "How do I figure this at the table on the fly?"
I suppose, if I'm Tippin, I first have to guess what my opponents have. Then I have to figure the odds of Greenstein catching an ace or a king (or an ace AND a king, or two aces, or two kings, etc.) vs. the odds of Reese catching 2 sixes vs. the odds of Tippin NOT catching a queen, and then comparing that to the payoff. Then again, maybe this "underdog" calculation takes into account the odds of everybody improving. I don't know, but it gives me a headache.
Or I can just look at the queens and go, "How pretty. I call." Tippin busted out, by the way, when Greenstein caught an ace AND a king, but according to the math, he made a good call. At least, that's what Vince Van Patten thought. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't lay down queens in that situation.
Can anybody help me out here? This "underdog-overdog" thing is driving me nuts. Figuring my odds of hitting a hand is easy. Figuring against an opponent seems a lot tougher, and against two opponents, I'll need Microsoft Excel. What is the proper method to calculate this?