PDA

View Full Version : USA Today-Online Gambling


Zoltri
02-08-2005, 09:54 AM
By Jon Swartz, USA TODAY
SAN FRANCISCO - Online gambling has hit the jackpot.
After years of escalating growth, it's poised for its biggest year. That reflects a growing obsession with poker, advances in broadband and wireless technology, and the temptation to strike it rich from a PC.

More than 2,000 gambling Web sites this year will rake in nearly $10 billion in revenue, most from U.S. consumers. That's up 40% from 2004. In 1996, when lawmakers first sought to curb Internet gambling, 30 sites collected $30 million, says researcher Christiansen Capital Advisors. That makes gambling one of the Internet's largest moneymakers, even though it is illegal.

Poker revenue is expected to double to more than $2 billion and attract 1 million players a month. Americans play at 266 Web sites, up from 53 in June 2003, says gaming site CasinoCity.com.

"Poker has jolted the industry," says Mike Sexton, a professional poker player who consults for PartyPoker.com, which is expected to haul in $1 billion in revenue this year. "Playing poker is a skill and considered cool," he says. "It's acceptable whether you're sitting around a table with friends or in front of a PC."

Technology and TV are paving the way. Peer-to-peer technology lets players compete head-to-head over the Internet in real time. Matches on ESPN, Bravo and the Travel Channel draw solid ratings. The popularity of poker, in turn, has further legitimized an industry once considered taboo by squeamish bettors.

"The fear factor is largely going away," says Alex Czajkowski, marketing director for Sportsbook.com. "The bigger, more reputable online casinos are not going to rip you off, and more people are betting."

That has meant more business for virtual slot machines, bingo and roulette. At the same time, advances in wireless technology make it easier for consumers to place wagers on sports events from cell phones or a personal digital assistant.

About 3% of people acknowledge gambling online at work, vs. 2% in 2003, according to a survey by Harris Interactive last year.

The surge hasn't escaped the attention of law-enforcement officials. But they are powerless to stop it.

Almost all gambling sites are offshore, where they are immune from U.S. law.Federal and state officials have discouraged some banks from allowing their credit cards to be used for cyberwagers.

The federal 1961 Wire Act prohibits the use of phone lines for placing bets, but there is no national law that applies to Internet gambling.

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who has spearheaded efforts to crack down on Internet gambling since 1996, might try again this year.

Brainwalter
02-08-2005, 10:43 AM
Of the articles I've seen on the subject, this one stands out as balanced and without editorializing.

johnfromvirginia
02-08-2005, 08:43 PM
I don't think Sen. Kyl realizes that online poker is important enough to some of us that his efforts to make it illegal might end his career in the senate if he were to actually make any real headway on the issue. I would vote against any politician who supported anti-gaming legislation regardless of where he/she stands on any other issue.

bobbyi
02-08-2005, 09:02 PM
[ QUOTE ]
About 3% of people acknowledge gambling online at work

[/ QUOTE ]
Wow, that's a lot more than I would have guessed.

NLSoldier
02-08-2005, 09:09 PM
Touche!

shummie
02-08-2005, 09:39 PM
"Peer to peer technology..."

Do any poker sites use peer to peer or is this guy just throwing in a buzz word there?

I imagine a peer to peer setup for a poker site would introduce ENORMOUS security holes... not to mention that it is pretty much overkill. I don't see any downside to using a typical server-client setup.

- Jason

djack
02-08-2005, 10:34 PM
I thought I was allowed when I used to do it...

But then 2 weeks later my firm blocked it. Wah.

bobbyi
02-08-2005, 10:36 PM
[ QUOTE ]
"Peer to peer technology..."

Do any poker sites use peer to peer or is this guy just throwing in a buzz word there?

[/ QUOTE ]
Buzzword.

dakine
02-09-2005, 04:18 AM
The federal 1961 Wire Act prohibits the use of phone lines for placing bets, but there is no national law that applies to Internet gambling.

If that is the law then Phone Line Connections to the internet is illegal. Senator Kyl should look into this. /images/graemlins/wink.gif

Jstyal
02-09-2005, 06:10 AM
[ QUOTE ]
The federal 1961 Wire Act prohibits the use of phone lines for placing bets, but there is no national law that applies to Internet gambling.

If that is the law then Phone Line Connections to the internet is illegal. Senator Kyl should look into this. /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

So, if I switch from DSL (which uses a phone line) to a cable modem, my online gambling activities would no longer be aurguably illegal, according to federal law? LoL. The applicability of arcane laws dealing with prohibition in today's society: -EV

The cloning of a sabretooth tiger has a higher chance of succeeding than Kyl's attempt at halting internet gambling.

Kenrick
02-09-2005, 06:52 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I would vote against any politician who supported anti-gaming legislation regardless of where he/she stands on any other issue.

[/ QUOTE ]

The double-standard here is increasingly annoying. There are the Indian casinos, there is the State lottery junk, but there is no legal gambling otherwise. Last I read, online gambling is illegal in this state, too. Hypocrites. Fortunately, most law enforcement look the other way for local games at bars and bowling alleys and places.

MicroBob
02-09-2005, 08:24 AM
I posted this same article in the internet-forum but got no reply.
Evidently the discussion of such matters is better over here in NVG.


Later in the day my Mom forwarded me another article that seemed to cut-and-paste from the USA Today article while adding a few more little tid-bits.
Pretty much the same article...only longer.

Note...this is on an extremely right-wing Rush Limbaugh-esque web-site (the only political sites my Mom reads).
I believe that the general moral problems that the Christian-right may have with this type of stuff aren't even that common within the Republican party. For example....many of my Dad's republican golfing buddies either gamble in Biloxi...or have no problem with those that do.

I think that Kyl is in the extreme minority on this one...but that isn't to say he won't be able to scare enough feloow Republicans into supporting his legislation for the 'good of the country' etc etc.




With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...

Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2005 12:05 a.m. EST
Internet Gambling to Hit $10 Billion

Back in 1996, when Congress made its first feeble attempts to put the federal reins on Internet gambling, a mere 30 gambling Web sites pulled in $30 million, industry researcher Christiansen Capital Advisors told USA Today.

This year, however, the pot will grow to an astounding $10 billion, up by 40 percent over the take in 2004. Not bad when you consider that the whole Internet gambling business is operating outside the law.

Poker is getting the credit – or the blame, depending on how you look at it. USA Today reports that the take from that game alone is expected to double, to more than $2 billion, and attracts 1 million players a month. According to gaming site CasinoCity.com, Americans play the game at 266 Web sites, up from 53 in June 2003.

"Poker has jolted the industry," Mike Sexton told USA Today. Sexton, a professional poker player who consults for PartyPoker.com - expected to haul in $1 billion in revenue this year - added, "Playing poker is a skill and considered cool. ... It's acceptable whether you're sitting around a table with friends or in front of a PC."

Much of this bonanza is due to advances in technology, which allow poker players to compete face to face over the Internet in real time. Matches on ESPN, Bravo and even the Travel Channel draw solid ratings, according to USA Today.

The popularity of poker, in turn, has further legitimized an industry once frowned on by what the newspaper called "squeamish bettors." Heck, the "World Poker Tour" is even a publicly traded stock.

Alex Czajkowski, marketing director for Sportsbook.com, told USA Today: "The fear factor is largely going away. The bigger, more reputable online casinos are not going to rip you off, and more people are betting."

All this has had a ripple effect, creating more business for virtual slot machines, bingo and roulette. Moreover, advances in wireless technology make it easier for consumers to bet on sports events from cell phones or a personal digital assistant.

Another effect, unwelcome by employers, is that some 3 percent of employees acknowledge gambling online at work, vs. only 2 percent in 2003, according to a survey by Harris Interactive last year.

And employers are not the only ones unhappy – you can bet that law enforcement officials don't look kindly on the growth of this clearly illegal (in the U.S.) enterprise. Nor can local or state governments milk the industry for taxes. There's nothing they can do about it.

As USA Today reported, almost all Internet gambling sites are offshore, where they are immune from U.S. law. About all the federal and state officials can do is discourage some banks from allowing their credit cards to be used for cyberwagers, and while the federal 1961 Wire Act prohibits the use of phone lines for placing bets, there is no national legislation that applies to Internet gambling.

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who has spearheaded efforts to crack down on Internet gambling for almost nine years, might try again this year, USA Today suggests.

But don't bet on it putting a dent in the mushrooming Internet gambling industry.

J.R.
02-09-2005, 03:21 PM
[ QUOTE ]
The federal 1961 Wire Act prohibits the use of phone lines for placing bets, but there is no national law that applies to Internet gambling.

[/ QUOTE ]

this would be wrong. the wire act applies to internet wagering on 'sporting events"- google "jay cohen". for a discussion as to the wire act's applicability to wagers not involving sports betting, consider In Re Mastercard (http://pub.bna.com/eclr/1321a.htm)