Slim Pickens
02-06-2005, 05:07 AM
Due to a recent incident in which my own inherent idiocy combined with a laughably-undersized ski jump landing, I am forced to suspend all two-armed activities for about six weeks. I’ve decided to ease my pain by getting somewhat serious (for a hobbyist anyway) about playing online SNG NLHE tournaments.
I play 11’s on Party right now. My immediate goal is to cash out my original bankroll ($500). I lost almost the whole thing through general uneducated beginner play at too high a level, but have built it back over the last two months after a lot of studying the basics. Now, my overall ROI is a stout +6% over a grand total of 235 tournaments (6’s, 11’s, and 22’s) and I’ve been able to cash out half my original bankroll. I think my play has improved immensely over that time, but I’d like to know for sure. This layup seems like the perfect opportunity to decide once and for all if I can be a winning player at this level. Here is my plan, on which I hope maybe someone will comment (good/bad/stupid idea?):
I will play 200 $11 SNG’s over a month or so, starting next Sunday upon my return from a non-gambling trip to Vegas, and consider them to be a sample free from learning curve pollution. If at the 200 mark my ROI is over 20% (about 93% winning confidence?), I’ll call myself a slowly-winning player at the 11’s, cash out the remaining original bankroll, and continue playing with the intention of moving up levels as my now-profit-only bankroll permits. Between 0% and 20%, consider myself a possible slow-loser and cash out what I feel I can to continue the experiment to a conclusive result. Negative ROI, evaluate money input as for any other hobby… supplement with bonus whoring. This is probably pocket change and drivel to a lot of you, but I’ve gotta start somewhere, right?
Slim
I play 11’s on Party right now. My immediate goal is to cash out my original bankroll ($500). I lost almost the whole thing through general uneducated beginner play at too high a level, but have built it back over the last two months after a lot of studying the basics. Now, my overall ROI is a stout +6% over a grand total of 235 tournaments (6’s, 11’s, and 22’s) and I’ve been able to cash out half my original bankroll. I think my play has improved immensely over that time, but I’d like to know for sure. This layup seems like the perfect opportunity to decide once and for all if I can be a winning player at this level. Here is my plan, on which I hope maybe someone will comment (good/bad/stupid idea?):
I will play 200 $11 SNG’s over a month or so, starting next Sunday upon my return from a non-gambling trip to Vegas, and consider them to be a sample free from learning curve pollution. If at the 200 mark my ROI is over 20% (about 93% winning confidence?), I’ll call myself a slowly-winning player at the 11’s, cash out the remaining original bankroll, and continue playing with the intention of moving up levels as my now-profit-only bankroll permits. Between 0% and 20%, consider myself a possible slow-loser and cash out what I feel I can to continue the experiment to a conclusive result. Negative ROI, evaluate money input as for any other hobby… supplement with bonus whoring. This is probably pocket change and drivel to a lot of you, but I’ve gotta start somewhere, right?
Slim