endorsements

I'm so glad that Mason endorses internet poker. He claims in jis posts that all these sites are homest. With all the advertising, it's nice to know that Mason indicates that it's a legal activity, and that no one will be defrauded by the sites that advertize at 2+2.

You are reading more into his post, IMO, than what he means.


MS Sunshine

I think you're reading too much into the first post, MS Sunshine


Clearly, it's another bash internet poker post by someone who now is trying to imply that Mason may be crooked if a site is found to be crooked.


Whadda jerk


RB

Wrong, oh! Mason should post a disclaimer to be in compliance with the UCC. He has a catch 22, however. If he posts a clearly visible disclaimer that internet gambling is illegal, then the sites won't advertise. Mason is therefore corrupt. He's sold his soul for a few pieces of silver. He is a crook.