Alobar, WTF?

[Jdanz]

i saw you today, i respect you play at the table, and posts here. However today your stats were at 6-max

vpip 16.7
pfr 11.1

over 200 hands

were you getting ridiculously bad cards? or are you way tighter then what is seen as optimal on these boards?

-JDanz

[Michael Davis]

"over 200 hands"

This is a really bad post.

-Michael

[imitation]

I am 26.5/18 over my last 3k hands, I'm not this loose nor agr, your post is about as thought filled as my own.

[Alobar]

you sure it was me?


FWIW, my stats over about 90K worth of 6 max hands are about 22/16

[Jdanz]

i know it's a completely insignificant number of hands. Hence i was asking his normal numbers. I have found that 100 hands or so can give you a useful indicator of vpip, though not much else, as it converges FAR quicker then any other stat.

Otherwords: 200 is incredibly small, hence i'm asking what his normal stats are.

-JDanz

[Jdanz]

I'm retarded it was stheif and he mentioned your name, and i mixed it up. sorry.

[naphand]

[ QUOTE ]
i know it's a completely insignificant number of hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I have found that 100 hands or so can give you a useful indicator of vpip

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you have any understanding of what you are saying? This is one sad post...

I regularly have 200-300 hand sequences (or more) where I see V$IP 14% PFR 8% at 6-max.

I think it is time PT came with a course in basic statistics... /images/graemlins/laugh.gif

[Michael Davis]

Yeah, I mean, I'd be willing to bet you, I, and everyone else with a significant number of hands has a 200 hand stretch at under 10%. I could be wrong and defer to the math peoples here.

-Michael

[Gazza]

My VPIP is 26. Yesterday I played a 175 hands session with a VPIP of 9. VPIP converges quick but not that quick!
Gazza

[flawless_victory]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm retarded it was stheif and he mentioned your name, and i mixed it up. sorry.

[/ QUOTE ]he is VERRRRY tight.