ordinaryboy
01-25-2005, 01:37 PM
AJ i have heard been desrcibed as "the hand i hate the most" and "the hand i've lost the most money on", in general it does not get great press.
As i have a little time on my hands i thought that i would attempt to defend poor old little AJ by explaining how i play this 'troublesome' hand. In my opinion i believe that if you play AJ correctly pre-flop it eliminates most of the problems you face post-flop. This rant will be split into 3 parts, the first part will look at the big mistake of calling a pre-flop raise with AJ, part two will look at how to play AJ pre-flop in early and middle position whilst the final part will deal with playing AJ pre-flop in late position.
Now i think the biggest mistake that is made and probably the most discerning factor of why AJ gets slammed so much is because people do not lay it down pre-flop when there is a raise either before or after. Now most people will think i'm not bringing any startling new fact by saying this but people still do it.
A pre-flop raise generally (obviously dependant on the player making the raise) tells the table that "i have AA-JJ or Ak/Aq", the latter the raise, the fewer the players and the tighter the table we might add other hands but for the moment we will assume these hands. Obviously AJ sucks amazing balls against all these hands say the flop is Jxx can you be sure that the pre-flop raiser hasnt got AA-JJ and is beating you. Also say the flop is Axx can u say for sure that the pfr hasnt got AA, AK, AQ no you cant so your in an awful predicament, so what are we looking for here 2 pair maybe, that still leaving the horrible thought of them having AA or JJ, therefore i believe that you should only call a pfr if you have the following criteria:
1. It is/is going to be a multi-way pot
2. You have position on pfr and most if not all of the others callers.
3. Your AJ is suited
4. The pfr has a high pfr% and a high VP$IP%
Anyway thats the basic stuff which i imagine most people already do.
Any criticism of this please tell me as criticism and discussion can only further mine, yours and other readers play. Part 2 will follow soon and will be perhaps a little less orthodox i will also try to answer any responses then
thank you
As i have a little time on my hands i thought that i would attempt to defend poor old little AJ by explaining how i play this 'troublesome' hand. In my opinion i believe that if you play AJ correctly pre-flop it eliminates most of the problems you face post-flop. This rant will be split into 3 parts, the first part will look at the big mistake of calling a pre-flop raise with AJ, part two will look at how to play AJ pre-flop in early and middle position whilst the final part will deal with playing AJ pre-flop in late position.
Now i think the biggest mistake that is made and probably the most discerning factor of why AJ gets slammed so much is because people do not lay it down pre-flop when there is a raise either before or after. Now most people will think i'm not bringing any startling new fact by saying this but people still do it.
A pre-flop raise generally (obviously dependant on the player making the raise) tells the table that "i have AA-JJ or Ak/Aq", the latter the raise, the fewer the players and the tighter the table we might add other hands but for the moment we will assume these hands. Obviously AJ sucks amazing balls against all these hands say the flop is Jxx can you be sure that the pre-flop raiser hasnt got AA-JJ and is beating you. Also say the flop is Axx can u say for sure that the pfr hasnt got AA, AK, AQ no you cant so your in an awful predicament, so what are we looking for here 2 pair maybe, that still leaving the horrible thought of them having AA or JJ, therefore i believe that you should only call a pfr if you have the following criteria:
1. It is/is going to be a multi-way pot
2. You have position on pfr and most if not all of the others callers.
3. Your AJ is suited
4. The pfr has a high pfr% and a high VP$IP%
Anyway thats the basic stuff which i imagine most people already do.
Any criticism of this please tell me as criticism and discussion can only further mine, yours and other readers play. Part 2 will follow soon and will be perhaps a little less orthodox i will also try to answer any responses then
thank you