Forbillz
01-25-2005, 11:50 AM
Okay, everyone always does probability calcs based on all their outs being live. My question is this:
Let's assume I'm at a game of 10, and I have 2 spades and see the flop. 2 spades come up. Calcs are usually done assuming 9 outs.
I'd argue that, with 9 other players out there, there are 19 dead cards (including the one burn card prior to flop). Wouldn't logic say that there should be 4.75 spades already gone? (25% of 19 cards). And therefore, isn't it more correct to assume 4-5 outs are more likely out there than 9?
Obviously, in any given situation, as many as 9 more spades could be there, but over time, wouldn't it be more likely this way?
Thanks.
Let's assume I'm at a game of 10, and I have 2 spades and see the flop. 2 spades come up. Calcs are usually done assuming 9 outs.
I'd argue that, with 9 other players out there, there are 19 dead cards (including the one burn card prior to flop). Wouldn't logic say that there should be 4.75 spades already gone? (25% of 19 cards). And therefore, isn't it more correct to assume 4-5 outs are more likely out there than 9?
Obviously, in any given situation, as many as 9 more spades could be there, but over time, wouldn't it be more likely this way?
Thanks.