fishfeet
01-24-2005, 11:11 PM
6 handed live NL $.10/$.20.
In the CO with A-7 clubs.
Button calls, as do SB and BB checks.
Flop: A/images/graemlins/diamond.gifA/images/graemlins/spade.gif8/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
Button and SB are extremely loose players who will bet anything or nothing all the time (one even called blind the entire way, flipped over his cards and had a straight)
Both check and I bet knowing at least one will call or even raise. Button raises, SB folds. I call.
Turn is a 10/images/graemlins/club.gif
Check. check.
River: 7/images/graemlins/spade.gif
Player bets about $1.50 into a pot of about $5 (he had done this all night and had flipped over nothing all night, or at best middle or 3rd pair. very rarely anything of any quality)
I feel my full is good, I raised $5. He went all-in. At this point I only had about $5 more left of my stack, so I called, of course.
My question is, after he checked on the turn, should I have taken that as a sign he might have filled up? And then just called his river bet rather than riasing?
Seeing him play all night (he is new to our table) I was just disgusted at the play I saw. I mean, I liked all the money in the pot, but it just seemed he would hit something the few times he got all his money in.
Example: I had KQs on button. I raised, he called with 9-10o. Flop is 9-Q-x. He bets, I raised (a little more than the pot if I recall) He called. Turn a 10. He checks, I went allin. He thinks for a long time and called. I needed a J Q K or whatever the X was on the river and didnt hit.
So seeing all this crap I felt the river raise with my Aces full was good.
Blah - Im not really sure what Im trying to get out of this post, just venting I guess.
The only thing I might have been able to do on the river was just call that tiny bet.
In the CO with A-7 clubs.
Button calls, as do SB and BB checks.
Flop: A/images/graemlins/diamond.gifA/images/graemlins/spade.gif8/images/graemlins/diamond.gif
Button and SB are extremely loose players who will bet anything or nothing all the time (one even called blind the entire way, flipped over his cards and had a straight)
Both check and I bet knowing at least one will call or even raise. Button raises, SB folds. I call.
Turn is a 10/images/graemlins/club.gif
Check. check.
River: 7/images/graemlins/spade.gif
Player bets about $1.50 into a pot of about $5 (he had done this all night and had flipped over nothing all night, or at best middle or 3rd pair. very rarely anything of any quality)
I feel my full is good, I raised $5. He went all-in. At this point I only had about $5 more left of my stack, so I called, of course.
My question is, after he checked on the turn, should I have taken that as a sign he might have filled up? And then just called his river bet rather than riasing?
Seeing him play all night (he is new to our table) I was just disgusted at the play I saw. I mean, I liked all the money in the pot, but it just seemed he would hit something the few times he got all his money in.
Example: I had KQs on button. I raised, he called with 9-10o. Flop is 9-Q-x. He bets, I raised (a little more than the pot if I recall) He called. Turn a 10. He checks, I went allin. He thinks for a long time and called. I needed a J Q K or whatever the X was on the river and didnt hit.
So seeing all this crap I felt the river raise with my Aces full was good.
Blah - Im not really sure what Im trying to get out of this post, just venting I guess.
The only thing I might have been able to do on the river was just call that tiny bet.