PDA

View Full Version : who played at the NL50 2+2 table and claimed to be redpill?


amoeba
01-24-2005, 07:31 PM
after reading that excruciating long propaganda thread, I realized that who claimed to be redpill in the 2+2 game actually wasn't.

I feel cheated because I think said villain bluffed me out of some pots where I would have played had I known he was not in fact redpill.

: )

so please, reveal yourself.

jhall23
01-24-2005, 07:38 PM
sephus already claimed it.

TrailofTears
01-24-2005, 07:40 PM
I'm pretty sure it was Sephus. I wish I could have been inside your brain as you played hands against Sephus when he was playing under the guise of theredpill. You must have been so baffled.

amoeba
01-24-2005, 07:41 PM
ah.

arg.....

So many folded AQs.........

damn you sephus and your trickery.

: )

amoeba
01-24-2005, 07:42 PM
there were many hands where I was like, theredpill gotta be playing pretty tight. No way he is bluffing here.

: (

theredpill
01-24-2005, 07:45 PM
wow, why did you give me such respect ? LOL....this is hilarious. How come you wouldn't be like , hey its redpill I have to call this to the river ?

amoeba
01-24-2005, 07:48 PM
because I remember you posting about check folding if you miss the flop with AK.

I also figure a newer player playing at a 2+2 table would not attempt fancy maniac moves for fear of embarrasement. Therefore I expected you to play tight and only raise me when you had the nuts or something close to it.

theredpill
01-24-2005, 07:50 PM
LOLOLOL.... is there going to be another one of these ? This time I will show up for real.

TrailofTears
01-24-2005, 07:51 PM
Are you and I thinking of the same theredpill? Or can you elaborate why you gave him credit for monsters? I just can't fathom having the same response. I think I would just insult him and take his tilted money. (note: theredpill is the only player I would speak of using such tactics on, because he has proven to be such an ass to so many posters on here.)

- ToT

amoeba
01-24-2005, 07:59 PM
I am sure there will be one again at some time in the future.

amoeba
01-24-2005, 08:03 PM
well he was playing pretty tight and not making a lot of raises preflop.

It wasn't any big pots that I lost.

I just lament the few times I folded AQ on the button preflop only to have him show his successful steal with AT or AXs.

and of course due to everybody except maybe YETI playing around 15 VPIP, I didn't get another hand where he raised preflop again.

TheWorstPlayer
01-24-2005, 08:12 PM
Yeah 2+2ers are a bunch of tight little girls. Next time we should have some minimum VPIP requirements.

jhall23
01-24-2005, 08:17 PM
Yes, a couple of us had gametime up on the PL 25 table everyone was pretty much in the same range of stats.

~20 VP$IP
~8% pf raise
~2.0 Post flop agression.

Needless to say I have never seen that before at a PP table before.

TheWorstPlayer
01-24-2005, 09:14 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a couple of us had gametime up on the PL 25 table everyone was pretty much in the same range of stats.

~20 VP$IP
~8% pf raise
~2.0 Post flop agression.

Needless to say I have never seen that before at a PP table before.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup. I got embarassed by Matt Flynn on that table. And those were my stats, too. /images/graemlins/smile.gif

theredpill
01-24-2005, 09:23 PM
BTW, that Propaganda thread has taken on a life of its own. 98 replies and 752 view currently. It is becoming bigger than the Small Stakes forum itself.

Sephus
01-25-2005, 01:05 AM
no trickery, i was just kidding around when i first sat down. like i've said elsewhere, i identified myself as sephus like four of five times. dunno how you missed them all. i wasn't playing assuming people thought i was TRP. i'm pretty sure i even corrected you once when you referred to me as him.

BobboFitos
01-25-2005, 03:18 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a couple of us had gametime up on the PL 25 table everyone was pretty much in the same range of stats.

~20 VP$IP
~8% pf raise
~2.0 Post flop agression.

Needless to say I have never seen that before at a PP table before.

[/ QUOTE ]

Smiley was gamb0000ling it up

yeah, it was intense... like 5 of 9 had TAG icons, a few moneybags, only 1 fish. (Yeah... Smiley was fun though... :P )

mythrilfox
01-25-2005, 03:26 AM
Someone explain how I can join these so-called 2+2 tables. /images/graemlins/frown.gif

rickr
01-25-2005, 09:24 AM
Hey, was I the fish? I'm a newbe, but got bold a few times. Had a ball.

Later,
Rick

amoeba
01-25-2005, 11:36 AM
hehe, maybe I missed it.

I mean I did ask gutei 3 times who he was on 2+2.

amoeba
01-25-2005, 11:47 AM
they aren't on all the time. I don't think you want to play them everyday.

just that one day.

it was from Matt Flynn's thread. ww 2+2.

we do this every now and then.

jhall23
01-25-2005, 12:09 PM
Not at the PL 25 Table I played at. You had a 23 VP$IP, 7.3 PFR, 4.1 Post Flop Agression, 17.5 % went to showdown.

CCass
01-25-2005, 12:54 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a couple of us had gametime up on the PL 25 table everyone was pretty much in the same range of stats.

~20 VP$IP
~8% pf raise
~2.0 Post flop agression.

Needless to say I have never seen that before at a PP table before.

[/ QUOTE ]

Smiley was gamb0000ling it up

yeah, it was intense... like 5 of 9 had TAG icons, a few moneybags, only 1 fish. (Yeah... Smiley was fun though... :P )

[/ QUOTE ]

I would like to know which icon I had (hopefully not the fish...lol). On the $50NL table, one player made a comment about my tightness, and unless he was yanking my chain, I feel good about showing a tight image at that table.

I did try to cash in on the tight image once, but Bruiser was to my left and caught a hand, so I had to change my plans mid-hand.

BobboFitos
01-25-2005, 01:11 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Hey, was I the fish? I'm a newbe, but got bold a few times. Had a ball.

Later,
Rick

[/ QUOTE ]

No

also, this is just for my own mindset, I auto rate fish according to BB/100, (I think without checking it it's like -12+ptBB/100 = fish) it just makes it easy for me to follow them

so it has little to do with VPIP, pfr, etc