papilindo
01-22-2005, 11:56 AM
I am wondering which of the following (or perhaps some other) is the best money managment method to use per session. The question assumes an hourly win rate of 1.5 big bets per hour (calculated over 1 year of play), playing 3 sessions per day, up to 3 real-time hours per session (on 3 tables), 5 days per week.
1)have a set stop/lock $ amount (to be implemented wether up or down) OR
2)play to the clock, meaning simply play out the full 3 hours per session regardless of amount up or down
I have been using the first method, playing $1/2 on 3 internet tables simultaneously and locking up at $30 (keep $20 and play out $10, with subsequent lockups of every $10 if I continue to win or stopping when that $10 is gone), or stopping if I go down $30. My thought however, is that perhaps the time method is better as over the long run my 1.5 big bets per hour ($3 x's 3 tables = $9) will work itself out in the long run and perhaps win me more money. Also, I wouldn't have the "stress" of getting to the lock up, tightening up my play when getting close, etc. So, in short: is a $ goal based session better or a time based session? Thanks in advance for any advice.
1)have a set stop/lock $ amount (to be implemented wether up or down) OR
2)play to the clock, meaning simply play out the full 3 hours per session regardless of amount up or down
I have been using the first method, playing $1/2 on 3 internet tables simultaneously and locking up at $30 (keep $20 and play out $10, with subsequent lockups of every $10 if I continue to win or stopping when that $10 is gone), or stopping if I go down $30. My thought however, is that perhaps the time method is better as over the long run my 1.5 big bets per hour ($3 x's 3 tables = $9) will work itself out in the long run and perhaps win me more money. Also, I wouldn't have the "stress" of getting to the lock up, tightening up my play when getting close, etc. So, in short: is a $ goal based session better or a time based session? Thanks in advance for any advice.