MicroBob
01-22-2005, 04:35 AM
Just saw the commercials for episode 3 (which I didn't pay much attention to at the end of episode 2).
The Matador and Eddie are getting ready to get into the big game with the Australian high-roller guy that is flying in.
Matador tells Eddie before the game "If I clear my throat before I raise, then you re-raise me. Okay??"
Something like that anyway.
I think Eddie is playing with Matador's money so he's certainly not trying to gun-down Eddie on this one.
I think all the colluding they are showing might encourage the same stuff in our regular B&M play....but, here's the twist...those who will think they are going to kill the 20/40 limit game by doing this are going to be in for a rude surprise because they are too stupid to understand when they should be raising the pot or not.
In other words, Tilt's collusion-promoting will actually be good for the typical 2+2 LAG because it will just help the idiots give-away their money even faster.
Would the stupidest of colluders have a better chance of accidental success if they were doing it on the NL games (which is all they play on Tilt)?? I don't know.
But somehow I doubt it. I think they are still more apt to bankrupt themselves then any of their opponents.
Thoughts??
The Matador and Eddie are getting ready to get into the big game with the Australian high-roller guy that is flying in.
Matador tells Eddie before the game "If I clear my throat before I raise, then you re-raise me. Okay??"
Something like that anyway.
I think Eddie is playing with Matador's money so he's certainly not trying to gun-down Eddie on this one.
I think all the colluding they are showing might encourage the same stuff in our regular B&M play....but, here's the twist...those who will think they are going to kill the 20/40 limit game by doing this are going to be in for a rude surprise because they are too stupid to understand when they should be raising the pot or not.
In other words, Tilt's collusion-promoting will actually be good for the typical 2+2 LAG because it will just help the idiots give-away their money even faster.
Would the stupidest of colluders have a better chance of accidental success if they were doing it on the NL games (which is all they play on Tilt)?? I don't know.
But somehow I doubt it. I think they are still more apt to bankrupt themselves then any of their opponents.
Thoughts??