11-08-2001, 04:56 AM
I only bet college football (when it's not baseball season). I look at the lines on monday, and bet the favorites immediately. I mark down the dogs I like, then bet them right before gametime on the knowledge that 80% of the time a line moves, it makes the favorite a bigger favorite. I save/gain points in the spread this way, and I'm sure it is something many of the posters here do as well.
I wonder, however, about some of the problems that may be inherent in this manner of doing things. Obviously my dogs are getting more points because more and more people think it's a great idea to bet the other way. How should I feel about this?
Great, because most people betting sports are idiots?
Great, because if I liked em at 6, I should love em at 8?
Terrible, because the late bettors know what they're doing better then everyone else?
Does anybody know if late line shifts are historically predictive in any way?
I wonder, however, about some of the problems that may be inherent in this manner of doing things. Obviously my dogs are getting more points because more and more people think it's a great idea to bet the other way. How should I feel about this?
Great, because most people betting sports are idiots?
Great, because if I liked em at 6, I should love em at 8?
Terrible, because the late bettors know what they're doing better then everyone else?
Does anybody know if late line shifts are historically predictive in any way?