**OFFICIAL** Eagles Domination of Vikings Thread [Archive]

CCx

01-16-2005, 12:26 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Vikes will win. That is all.

[/ QUOTE ]

Vikes had their Super Bowl last week - they fold to a superior team today - that is REALLY all. Tune in shortly /images/graemlins/grin.gif

TaxGoddess

01-16-2005, 12:47 PM

I concur - <font color="green"> GO EAGLES!!!! </font>

guller

01-16-2005, 12:48 PM

Cullpecker guaranteed to have at least 2 fumbles today.

DemonDeac

01-16-2005, 01:00 PM

Moss guaranteed to be crushed by huge hit by B Dawk or M Lewis, the hardest hitting safeties in the NFL. No doubt.

Gordon Bombay

01-16-2005, 01:00 PM

DemonDeac

01-16-2005, 01:02 PM

[ QUOTE ]
You're a nerd. Look at that picture.

[/ QUOTE ]

are u kidding? my avatar pic is hilarious. ur a tool for not finding it funny. go coach the ducks, bombay.

Slacker13

01-16-2005, 01:12 PM

I am thinking the Eags are going to have a hard time today. Vikes are pretty pumped after beating GB in Lambeau. Either way today should be some great football.

Zoltri

01-16-2005, 01:26 PM

This will be the Vikings 3rd straight road game and if Philly can score one early, Minny will pack it in. If Vikings score first (god forbid) they will have definite momentum coupled with last weeks effort.
I honestly feel the first TD will be the biggest play of the game for bettors.

CrazyEyez

01-16-2005, 01:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Vikes will win. That is all.

[/ QUOTE ]

Vikes have won what, 2 or 3 road games total in the last 3 years? You think they're going to win 2 in a row now? Let's be realistic.

IggyWH

01-16-2005, 02:11 PM

WEARING PURPLE AND YELLOW TODAY!

F-U-C-K T-H-E E-A-G-L-E-S

Sponger15SB

01-16-2005, 02:21 PM

K I have not seen anything about the game yet and I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say

34-24 Vikings

istewart

01-16-2005, 02:29 PM

Even though the Eagles are severely weaker than they were and perhaps "overly rested" like everyone says, the Vikings are easily beatable. If Minnesota somehow wins it's going to be hell here in Philadelphia.

Zoltri

01-16-2005, 02:32 PM

TD!!!!!!
Just what the doctor ordered.

Sheriff Fatman

01-16-2005, 02:58 PM

View from the UK:

EEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEE EESSSSSSSSSSS

Sheriff

pudley4

01-16-2005, 03:04 PM

That was fuc[/b]king ridiculous

/images/graemlins/mad.gif /images/graemlins/mad.gif /images/graemlins/mad.gif

istewart

01-16-2005, 03:05 PM

LOL

Sponger15SB

01-16-2005, 03:13 PM

3rd and inches and they go long. How fuc[/b]king pathetic.

pudley4

01-16-2005, 03:19 PM

[ QUOTE ]
3rd and inches and they go long. How fuc[/b]king pathetic.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are an idiot. That was a good call because they're obviously going for it on 4th down.

theredwave

01-16-2005, 03:20 PM

Randy Moss is the idiot.

CrazyEyez

01-16-2005, 03:21 PM

What a classic Vikings play. That was hilarious.

Slacker13

01-16-2005, 03:22 PM

The birds are looking good.

istewart

01-16-2005, 03:23 PM

*Awaits Kornheiser, Reali, and Wilbon to have their fun with Moss on Monday*

pudley4

01-16-2005, 03:25 PM

/images/graemlins/mad.gif

CrazyEyez

01-16-2005, 03:29 PM

[ QUOTE ]
*Awaits Kornheiser, Reali, and Wilbon to have their fun with Moss on Monday*

[/ QUOTE ]

They are obviously prejudiced against Moss and the Vikings and should be removed from television.
Haha

istewart

01-16-2005, 03:38 PM

wtf McNabb...

Zoltri

01-16-2005, 03:39 PM

Agreed.
Im happy though...won 1st quarter and half. /images/graemlins/grin.gif

lastchance

01-16-2005, 03:42 PM

Good call, yeah. But Randy Moss, jeez, what is that guy doing?
Could say the same for McNabb.

Still, if Eagles recievers and defense keep making some plays, this game is over.

pshreck

01-16-2005, 03:46 PM

Am I the only one that thinks a 17 point lead is significantly better than a 14 point lead (at first glance they look close...)

That is so unlike Andy Reid, just take the 3 and go up by a minimum of 3 scores...

benfranklin

01-16-2005, 03:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that thinks a 17 point lead is significantly better than a 14 point lead (at first glance they look close...)

That is so unlike Andy Reid, just take the 3 and go up by a minimum of 3 scores...

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the over/under? Looks like Andy bet the under.

Zoltri

01-16-2005, 03:51 PM

I couldnt agree with you more. One TD and the Vikings are covering again.
Im still nervous about this one...many books have the 2nd half as a pick'em.

benfranklin

01-16-2005, 03:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Good call, yeah. But Randy Moss, jeez, what is that guy doing?

[/ QUOTE ]

It wasn't Randy's fault this time. The Vikes had 12 men on the field, and Randy was called off. There was an extra lineman who was not supposed to be in.

NoChance

01-16-2005, 03:55 PM

Even if that is true, Randy should stay in. They could get away with it or they might get panalized and be forced to kick the field goal.

pshreck

01-16-2005, 03:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Good call, yeah. But Randy Moss, jeez, what is that guy doing?

[/ QUOTE ]

It wasn't Randy's fault this time. The Vikes had 12 men on the field, and Randy was called off. There was an extra lineman who was not supposed to be in.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im a little hazy on the rules... if he had stayed on the field, would the play be called dead and the vikings could just kick a fg after the penalty yards... or could the eagles just decline the penalty and take the ball.

Sponger15SB

01-16-2005, 04:01 PM

should be a personal foul on the guy who hacked culpepper.

craig r

01-16-2005, 04:07 PM

the eagles could have declined the penalty and it would have been the eagle's ball.

craig

NoChance

01-16-2005, 04:08 PM

True, but I was assuming he would catch the ball for a touchdown because nobody was out there guarding him. Then they would not decline it.

pudley4

01-16-2005, 04:21 PM

we'll see if they fuc[/b]k it up

Joe Tall

01-16-2005, 04:26 PM

Is Philly trying to lose this game? Why does it seem that the score should be 38-7 but it isn't.

Go Pats!
Joe Tall

benfranklin

01-16-2005, 04:37 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Is Philly trying to lose this game? Why does it seem that the score should be 38-7 but it isn't.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Vikings seem to be determined to match the Iggles bumble for bumble. Fourth and 22, and they go for it? The Eagles should have made a field goal at the end of the 1st half, and each team should have scored at least one more TD than they have.

Ozzzz

01-16-2005, 04:37 PM

that looked like a good defensive play to me...

Riskwise

01-16-2005, 04:41 PM

BRIAN RUSSEL IS BORDERLINE RETARDED!!! /images/graemlins/mad.gif /images/graemlins/mad.gif /images/graemlins/mad.gif

Vikes should fire everyone on D but K-Will and draft their whole starting D next year

CCx

01-16-2005, 05:46 PM

i havent read this threaad but i can say two things:\\1

1. eff you to the haters
2. E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!!!!!!!

CCx

01-16-2005, 05:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Vikes will win. That is all.

[/ QUOTE ]

NO!~!!@!#^!@%!^*@

CCx

01-16-2005, 05:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
WEARING PURPLE AND YELLOW TODAY!

F-U-C-K T-H-E E-A-G-L-E-S

[/ QUOTE ]

NOPE, SORRY, GO BIRDS, WHAT?!@?!?@!?@?!@?!?@!

CCx

01-16-2005, 05:48 PM

[ QUOTE ]
34-24 Vikings

[/ QUOTE ]

NO!!!!!!!!

CCx

01-16-2005, 06:17 PM

and to recap:

field goal instead of screen pass before half +3
freddie mitchell touchdown instead of fumble out of bounds in the end zone and touchback +7

so they only won by 13, what a shame right??

but guess what, THEY WON, WHAT CAN THE HATERS SAY NOW - they outplayed minny on both sides of the ball, and i want to see one person in this thread who was all for minnesota talk junk on this team

guess what rust is...NOTHING, what happened today??? where was daunte today??? where was moss shaking his dick today??? where was the vaunted vikings offense today???? i told y'all it was all defense today, and birds ate em up, big win, huge win, points all day and guess what:

we're eating vick UP next week - hear me now, or see me later, jump on y'all /images/graemlins/grin.gif