1 table bubble problem

[ALG]

First of all, this is limit omaha hi low, single table tournament... here's the hand in question...


***** Hand History for Game 1427563767 *****
300/600 TourneyOmahaHiLoGameTable (Limit) (Tournament 8622316) - Wed Jan 12 20:16:00 EST 2005
Table Table 10887 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 1: juseetheflop (6435)
Seat 2: jm45694 (338)
Seat 3: vegasnevada (722)
Seat 9: phjrjr (505)
phjrjr posts small blind (150)
juseetheflop posts big blind (300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to phjrjr [ 9h, 7d, 9c, Kd ]
jm45694 folds.
vegasnevada folds.
phjrjr folds.
** Summary **
Main Pot: 450
juseetheflop balance 6585, bet 300, collected 450, net +150
jm45694 balance 338, didn't bet (folded)
vegasnevada balance 722, didn't bet (folded)
phjrjr balance 355, lost 150 (folded)

a friend of mine thinks i should have gone all in on this hand automatically, where as i maintain given that we were right on the bubble and the player in the 2 seat had to go all in before me, i was correct to fold this clearly one way hand to a big blind who was simply GOING to call (he'd been calling with everything for about 15 hands since acquiring his stack...)

what do you think?

[bigredlemon]

you can't win low, you don't have a good shot at winning high, and you'll get definetly get called. Why exactly to you want to go all in? Let the tiny stack get blinded out, or at least wait for a hand you have SOME chance of scooping.

If JM survives or even manages to double up, then i'd worry about pushing at/before I'm BB again.

[pindawg]

Thats a horrid hand

[ALG]

thanks for the feedback... i was 95% convinced my fold was correct but it never hurts one's ego to hear it from other people...