TightIsRight
01-11-2005, 06:18 PM
In his December 31 Card Player article, Daniel Negreanu writes:
"With the blinds now at $1,000-$2,000 with a $300 ante, I raised to $5,000 from first position with the 7 /images/graemlins/spade.gif 4 /images/graemlins/spade.gif. I know, I know, the books tell you to fold those hands. I guess I should read one of them, eventually. Or, better yet, when I write one, I’ll explain to you why these types of hands do very well in deep-stack tournaments. Guys like Alan Goehring, Gus Hansen, Phil Ivey, and the like don’t play these hands because they are bored; they play them because there is method to the madness."
Playing hands like this makes you hard to read, and adds a lot of deception to your game. Outside of that, it seems to me that you're always getting in there with the worst of it (esp. in this case where he is raising UTG). Can someone explain the "method to the madness"?
"With the blinds now at $1,000-$2,000 with a $300 ante, I raised to $5,000 from first position with the 7 /images/graemlins/spade.gif 4 /images/graemlins/spade.gif. I know, I know, the books tell you to fold those hands. I guess I should read one of them, eventually. Or, better yet, when I write one, I’ll explain to you why these types of hands do very well in deep-stack tournaments. Guys like Alan Goehring, Gus Hansen, Phil Ivey, and the like don’t play these hands because they are bored; they play them because there is method to the madness."
Playing hands like this makes you hard to read, and adds a lot of deception to your game. Outside of that, it seems to me that you're always getting in there with the worst of it (esp. in this case where he is raising UTG). Can someone explain the "method to the madness"?