11-04-2001, 12:32 AM
I write this while playing my favorite game at Paradise, an $11 tournament.
I trash talk about the joint all the time and I’m sure a few must wonder
why I play there. It’s simple. They continue to offer 10% buy-in bonuses
and I continue to take them up on them. Some I bust out, others I cash
out a little and bust out. This last one has paid pretty well and I’m still in
action with several hundred of freeroll bucks in hand and a small playing
bankroll in trust. Level IV now, must pay attention....
Back, 3rd place in hand. My only beatable game here at Paradise seems to
the small tournaments. I’ve played the ring games and at 1/2 and a buck
the action is an order of magnitude worse than any local live 4-8 game. I
just don’t understand how anyone would find it satisfactory. I played just
a little 2-4 and could not believe how tight it was. I’ve seen much better
action in daytime 40-80 live games. How anyone can find these games
beatable for much is beyond me. I would be easier with a partner or two
but even then it’d be slim pickins. I play my minimum 100 hands to
secure the 10% bonus and then play tournaments.
Here’s the real report. There are still too many suited hands getting dealt.
I did a formal survey and the net was 29% suited starters vs the expected
23.5%. To me this is not news. I’ve checked this 4 times and 3 of the 4
results were just like the last. I’ve applied correct testing and analysis and
won’t debate that side of it since I don’t give a shit if you believe me. I
really don’t. I’m interested in the strategy changes that are required to play
single table tournament hold-em in this environment. At the $11 level I
feel reasonably free of collusive cheating but this is an odd twist. It would
logically follow that if Paradise were pooping up the suited starters many
other issues would also be on the table for discussion. Sticking to just
what i know for sure a tight, top pair kind of player like myself should be
a lot more cautious of 2 and 3 of a suit on board. It also puts a lot of
junk cards into play 2s, 3s, 4s that are suited to a Q or J, hands the pigeons
just can’t fold at gunpoint. AA gets a 3 3 9 flop and is much more in
jeopardy than in a normal game. I’m sure there’s a bunch more. Post it here.
If you’re looking to reproduce my experiment simply play $11 tournaments
and record every starter dealt to you. A few hundred is a good starting sample. Level IV again, gotta go.
I trash talk about the joint all the time and I’m sure a few must wonder
why I play there. It’s simple. They continue to offer 10% buy-in bonuses
and I continue to take them up on them. Some I bust out, others I cash
out a little and bust out. This last one has paid pretty well and I’m still in
action with several hundred of freeroll bucks in hand and a small playing
bankroll in trust. Level IV now, must pay attention....
Back, 3rd place in hand. My only beatable game here at Paradise seems to
the small tournaments. I’ve played the ring games and at 1/2 and a buck
the action is an order of magnitude worse than any local live 4-8 game. I
just don’t understand how anyone would find it satisfactory. I played just
a little 2-4 and could not believe how tight it was. I’ve seen much better
action in daytime 40-80 live games. How anyone can find these games
beatable for much is beyond me. I would be easier with a partner or two
but even then it’d be slim pickins. I play my minimum 100 hands to
secure the 10% bonus and then play tournaments.
Here’s the real report. There are still too many suited hands getting dealt.
I did a formal survey and the net was 29% suited starters vs the expected
23.5%. To me this is not news. I’ve checked this 4 times and 3 of the 4
results were just like the last. I’ve applied correct testing and analysis and
won’t debate that side of it since I don’t give a shit if you believe me. I
really don’t. I’m interested in the strategy changes that are required to play
single table tournament hold-em in this environment. At the $11 level I
feel reasonably free of collusive cheating but this is an odd twist. It would
logically follow that if Paradise were pooping up the suited starters many
other issues would also be on the table for discussion. Sticking to just
what i know for sure a tight, top pair kind of player like myself should be
a lot more cautious of 2 and 3 of a suit on board. It also puts a lot of
junk cards into play 2s, 3s, 4s that are suited to a Q or J, hands the pigeons
just can’t fold at gunpoint. AA gets a 3 3 9 flop and is much more in
jeopardy than in a normal game. I’m sure there’s a bunch more. Post it here.
If you’re looking to reproduce my experiment simply play $11 tournaments
and record every starter dealt to you. A few hundred is a good starting sample. Level IV again, gotta go.