vanHelsing
01-01-2005, 11:18 AM
It has been just one week, when I read the article of David Sillers in the 2+2 online magazine, which caused me to give NL a serious try (PP,0.25/0.5, I started full ring, but now prefering the wild 6 max.).
And I love it!
I did well so far, but of course sample size is to small for results to be significant.
Now I realize, that most of my winnings come from average stacked games.
As soon as I double or triple my buy-in and have opponents with comparable stacks, I feel unwell and consequently I often leave, even if the table is still good.
But the deep stacked situations should be the opportunities to win (or lose) the real money, so this is a serious lack in my game.
I searched the forum to find a thread discussing some general guidelines on deep stacked tables, but couldn't find much.
Has there been some discussion on this point? Do you have a link, or can give me some keywords to search for?
Having only few instructions so far, my deep strategy was something like that:
- tighten up PF and particularly postflop when missing position. But is the tight approach a good game plan at 6 max, where acrimony is essential?
- if I have deep stacked opponents to my right, I leaned towards staying - if they are to my left, I leave.
- PPs rule - if I can get in under 10% of the lower involved stack I'll try to get in.
Is that reasonable so far?
Which more basics are there to consider?
Thanks for your thoughts in advance.
And I love it!
I did well so far, but of course sample size is to small for results to be significant.
Now I realize, that most of my winnings come from average stacked games.
As soon as I double or triple my buy-in and have opponents with comparable stacks, I feel unwell and consequently I often leave, even if the table is still good.
But the deep stacked situations should be the opportunities to win (or lose) the real money, so this is a serious lack in my game.
I searched the forum to find a thread discussing some general guidelines on deep stacked tables, but couldn't find much.
Has there been some discussion on this point? Do you have a link, or can give me some keywords to search for?
Having only few instructions so far, my deep strategy was something like that:
- tighten up PF and particularly postflop when missing position. But is the tight approach a good game plan at 6 max, where acrimony is essential?
- if I have deep stacked opponents to my right, I leaned towards staying - if they are to my left, I leave.
- PPs rule - if I can get in under 10% of the lower involved stack I'll try to get in.
Is that reasonable so far?
Which more basics are there to consider?
Thanks for your thoughts in advance.