10-21-2001, 03:02 PM
Well friends, he's done it again, made an overly aggressive play that I think just costs us money. But rather than argue with him, which does no good, I've decided to put him up to what I hope will be public humiliation.
!0-20 hold-em, 9 players, the first 2 fold, the next 2 limp in, and MS Sunshine raises w/ 88. It ends up going raise from the button and cap from one of the limpers, w/ BB calling, so he tosses before the flop. AND, as it turns out, he did have the limpers dominated ...one had 22, the other A7.
Here's my objection: in the best case scenario, he drives everyone out and only the two limpers call. Great, and if the flop comes low-low-low, you're good. Probably. But in a fairly loose game I think it should be expected that one behind and at least one of the blinds will call. And in that case, how many flops are there that a medium pair can be certain of having, and maintaining, the best hand?
I think the better play is to limp in and see the flop. What would you do?
Thanks in advance for your input, Mrs MS Sunshine
!0-20 hold-em, 9 players, the first 2 fold, the next 2 limp in, and MS Sunshine raises w/ 88. It ends up going raise from the button and cap from one of the limpers, w/ BB calling, so he tosses before the flop. AND, as it turns out, he did have the limpers dominated ...one had 22, the other A7.
Here's my objection: in the best case scenario, he drives everyone out and only the two limpers call. Great, and if the flop comes low-low-low, you're good. Probably. But in a fairly loose game I think it should be expected that one behind and at least one of the blinds will call. And in that case, how many flops are there that a medium pair can be certain of having, and maintaining, the best hand?
I think the better play is to limp in and see the flop. What would you do?
Thanks in advance for your input, Mrs MS Sunshine