How come 6-handed tables are fastest to clear the bonus?

[AA suited]

like regular tables, 6 handed tables need $2 in the pot to generate a rake. now wouldnt there be more times that a rake would be not generated at short handed tables because there's less players limping in?

Just wondering why people say 6handed tables are fastest way to clear a bonus?


From party's site:

Pot-Limit and No-Limit Games will be raked according to the chart below:

No. Of players Rake per pot Max.

2-3 $0.05 for each $1.0 in Pot $1.00
4-5 $0.05 for each $1.0 in Pot $2.00
6-9 $0.05 for each $1.0 in Pot $3.00

Note: If rake is less than $0.10, rake is zero.

[TwoNiner]

faster in time, as in hands per hour.

[AA suited]

[ QUOTE ]
faster in time, as in hands per hour.

[/ QUOTE ]

but w/the same $ requirement to produce a rake, won't it even out? you might have more hands per hr, but a lower % that it will generate a rake?

[Evan]

6 max tables tend to be more aggressive also.

[ctv1116]

More hands/hour, more aggressive. At least in limit tables, the largest avg pot size tables at a given limit usually come from the 6max rather than the full tables.