09-16-2001, 05:45 PM
I admit upfront that I am not a particularly sophisticated player. I don't seem to think in the properly analytical manner when it comes to playing decisions yet this 'Caveman' approach works very nicely in the Paradise single table tourneys - I have only won 3 of the 22 events I have played in, but have finished in the money on 7 other occassions, so I am well ahead at this point. Just as well, because I am bleeding money in the ring games using the same approach.
My basic gameplan is to play very tight in early seats but bet the few hands I play very aggressively and then gradually loosen up as I move toward the blinds to the point where I will almost always go for a steal with any kind of playable hand on the button. My thought process (such as it is)before the flop consists of saying to myself 'I can call two bets with this hand' or 'If nobody opens early I can raise here'etc. Like I said, pretty basic stuff. What I appear to be good at is forcing people to laydown after the flop with second pair or worse.
Obviously this is because it is a freeze out format and there are many players who can't bring themselves to make the correct calls or raises because if I have what I represent then they are going to be in a bad position, chips-wise. Also I win a few bets from the old chestnut of re-raising the 'obvious' stealer in the SB. Essentially on all decision points after the flop I just play super-aggressive and it (probably luckily)seems to work.
As I said this style is killing me in the ring games. It's like I'm playing with the cards face up - nobody lays down when I bet out after the flop and everybody calls or raises when I'm stealing.
Sorry this is so long, but I would be interested to hear whether you think I have called it right - that is that many players are too concious of their chip position or potential position in Tourneys, but they concentrate more on making the right play without regard to the money in ring games.
My basic gameplan is to play very tight in early seats but bet the few hands I play very aggressively and then gradually loosen up as I move toward the blinds to the point where I will almost always go for a steal with any kind of playable hand on the button. My thought process (such as it is)before the flop consists of saying to myself 'I can call two bets with this hand' or 'If nobody opens early I can raise here'etc. Like I said, pretty basic stuff. What I appear to be good at is forcing people to laydown after the flop with second pair or worse.
Obviously this is because it is a freeze out format and there are many players who can't bring themselves to make the correct calls or raises because if I have what I represent then they are going to be in a bad position, chips-wise. Also I win a few bets from the old chestnut of re-raising the 'obvious' stealer in the SB. Essentially on all decision points after the flop I just play super-aggressive and it (probably luckily)seems to work.
As I said this style is killing me in the ring games. It's like I'm playing with the cards face up - nobody lays down when I bet out after the flop and everybody calls or raises when I'm stealing.
Sorry this is so long, but I would be interested to hear whether you think I have called it right - that is that many players are too concious of their chip position or potential position in Tourneys, but they concentrate more on making the right play without regard to the money in ring games.