Least profitable/hardest sites

[Reef]

I'm thinking paradise followed by stars.

[DJMaytag]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking paradise followed by stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

I often hear that UB is. Many say that there are vast number of really good players there. I'd like to think of myself as one of them! /images/graemlins/grin.gif

Haven't played anywhere else yet, so I can't tell ya from my own experience.

[SCfuji]

full tilt can be difficult. id say most sites with low traffic are tough to break.

[beta1607]

I have not played stars but I think Paradise is very beatable although I have only played thier 200 NL and I dont think their 500 NL game is full that often.

[billyjex]

I've only played Party, Stars and Paradise, but Stars is by far the hardest. More tight, aggressive players. There are some good games on paradise.

[radek2166]

I find absolute to be a real pain in the ass

[Soviet Exile]

The caliber of play at UB is significantly better at the lower limits (1/2, 2/4) than Party, IMO.

[wall_st]

I play low limit, but I found paradise players to be pretty poor overall.

Ive heard different, but when I was clearing the bonus at interpoker it felt like the biggest rock garden in the world.

[DJMaytag]

Just for clarification, are we all speaking about limit or NL? Wonnder if some sites have great limit players but horrible NL players?

[fimbulwinter]

full tilt's NL sure was soft at times. dunno about the limit tho.

[iNsChris]

Uk-Poker.com ... Impossible for me to win anything! try your luck.

Full of retarded muppet raising on crappy hands so the guys with ok hands pay more too loose. I'm fustrated and want to kill them!

[Deli]

Damn them, damn them all! Why oh why can there not be more tight aggresive players?