06-26-2002, 12:39 PM
Here's my counter when I know someone is playing "The System."
The key to the success of the system is that it preys upon a good player's fear of busting out early. A good player doesn't want to risk all the chips preflop - a good player can score a lot of chips by good post-flop play, picking the right spots to bluff, etc. Thus, the System player steals lots of blinds by going all-in early.
To counteract the system, you have to shed at least some amount of this fear. But not too much. The trick is finding the proper balance between precaution and aggressiveness.
In the early rounds of a local $30 rebuy tourney, I have adopted the following standards. When I know or strongly suspect that someone is playing the system, I will reraise or call all in with any pocket pair 99 or better. I will fold anything else (even AK).
For me, this is the propper middle ground between precaution and aggressiveness that I am comfortable with given the tourney stakes. I know that, given the wide range of hands the System player will be raising all in with, I am likely to be a statistical favorite and bust him out or double up my stack. There is also a reasonable chance that he will show me a bigger pair or put a bad beat on me. That's poker. I am not afraid to get busted and go home. There is a better chance that I will bust him or double up, so I can call or reraise with no fear.
These standards may change if I am very large-stacked or very short-stacked. They would certainly change if I were playing in a higher stakes tourney. I doubt I would be willing to call all in with 99 on the first days of the Big One at the WSOP. That is why (as I think Sklansky states) the system works better the larger the tourney because players are more afraid to bust out early.
The point of this whole long ramble is that to counteract a player using the System, I am constantly attempting to define a set of hands that, given the tourney stakes, the chip levels, and other tourney factors, will achieve the proper balance between precaution and aggressiveness than I am comfortable with. Because the System player will move all-in with a (relatively) large number of hands, I will call or reraise with more hands than I would against a player I knew to be a good tight-aggressive tourney player.
Any thoughts?
The key to the success of the system is that it preys upon a good player's fear of busting out early. A good player doesn't want to risk all the chips preflop - a good player can score a lot of chips by good post-flop play, picking the right spots to bluff, etc. Thus, the System player steals lots of blinds by going all-in early.
To counteract the system, you have to shed at least some amount of this fear. But not too much. The trick is finding the proper balance between precaution and aggressiveness.
In the early rounds of a local $30 rebuy tourney, I have adopted the following standards. When I know or strongly suspect that someone is playing the system, I will reraise or call all in with any pocket pair 99 or better. I will fold anything else (even AK).
For me, this is the propper middle ground between precaution and aggressiveness that I am comfortable with given the tourney stakes. I know that, given the wide range of hands the System player will be raising all in with, I am likely to be a statistical favorite and bust him out or double up my stack. There is also a reasonable chance that he will show me a bigger pair or put a bad beat on me. That's poker. I am not afraid to get busted and go home. There is a better chance that I will bust him or double up, so I can call or reraise with no fear.
These standards may change if I am very large-stacked or very short-stacked. They would certainly change if I were playing in a higher stakes tourney. I doubt I would be willing to call all in with 99 on the first days of the Big One at the WSOP. That is why (as I think Sklansky states) the system works better the larger the tourney because players are more afraid to bust out early.
The point of this whole long ramble is that to counteract a player using the System, I am constantly attempting to define a set of hands that, given the tourney stakes, the chip levels, and other tourney factors, will achieve the proper balance between precaution and aggressiveness than I am comfortable with. Because the System player will move all-in with a (relatively) large number of hands, I will call or reraise with more hands than I would against a player I knew to be a good tight-aggressive tourney player.
Any thoughts?