grandgnu
12-04-2004, 02:31 PM
This is why I could never become a prop for an online casino. I just couldn't handle playing short-handed games.
I find that there's a lot more money and bad plays that I can take advantage of in full or very close to full tables (I'm talking mostly about Omaha hi/lo, 7-stud and 7-stud hi/lo, but also pot limit Omaha hi/lo and NL Hold Em)
Then again, my short-handed and heads-up play needs a lot of work. In tournament games I have little trouble doing well when there's a lot of players at the tables, but when people start dropping and we're down to 4-5 players I start playing worse I think.
Guess I'll start reading up more in this thread and try and improve my short-handed and heads-up game. But back to the original message: Does anyone prefer short-handed or heads-up play over playing a full table? And if so, why? I'm referring to ring games, since I see a lot more profit in my experience with more players and thus more money on the table and in each pot.
I find that there's a lot more money and bad plays that I can take advantage of in full or very close to full tables (I'm talking mostly about Omaha hi/lo, 7-stud and 7-stud hi/lo, but also pot limit Omaha hi/lo and NL Hold Em)
Then again, my short-handed and heads-up play needs a lot of work. In tournament games I have little trouble doing well when there's a lot of players at the tables, but when people start dropping and we're down to 4-5 players I start playing worse I think.
Guess I'll start reading up more in this thread and try and improve my short-handed and heads-up game. But back to the original message: Does anyone prefer short-handed or heads-up play over playing a full table? And if so, why? I'm referring to ring games, since I see a lot more profit in my experience with more players and thus more money on the table and in each pot.